Histologic predictors of clinically significant biochemical recurrence and PSA kinetics after radical prostatectomy.
Abstract
398 Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a key treatment for localized prostate cancer. However, 20–40% of patients experience biochemical recurrence (BCR)—defined as a PSA rise >0.2 ng/mL after surgery—indicating disease progression. Unfavorable histologic features, such as cribriform and intraductal carcinoma, have been shown to predict adverse oncologic outcomes and long-term disease progression following RP. We investigated whether these features can provide insight into the risk of BCR, PSA kinetics, and the risk of metastasis or cancer-related death after BCR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a post-RP group from one institution with a median follow-up of 13.5 years (7.9–17.8). Pathology specimens were re-reviewed by a blinded GU pathologist and classified as containing favorable (FH) or unfavorable (UH) histology. Outcomes included BCR, PSA doubling time (PSADT), and development of metastasis or cancer-specific death following BCR. Group differences were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact. Multivariable Cox regression or Logistic regression evaluated associations between histology type, BCR risk, and PSADT. Results: A total of 844 subjects met the inclusion criteria. BCR occurred in 33.8% (285/844), and 61.8% (123/199) had a PSADT ≤1 year. Patients with UH had higher rates of BCR (52% vs. 10%, p < 0.001), earlier BCR (26 vs. 60 months, p = 0.005), and more frequently had a PSADT ≤1 year (65% vs. 40%, p = 0.016). Among UH patients with BCR, metastatic progression (39% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific death (20% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) were more common. On multivariable analysis, UH (HR 3.47, p < 0.001), initial PSA (HR 1.02, p <0.001), positive margins (HR 1.48, p = 0.002), and grade group (HR 1.56, p < 0.001) were independently associated with BCR, while age and pathologic T stage were not. UH (OR 2.77, p = 0.044) and positive margins (OR 1.86, p = 0.047) were also associated with PSADT ≤1 year, while age, initial PSA, and pathologic T stage were not. Conclusions: UH features were associated with higher rates of clinically-significant BCR resulting in adverse cancer outcomes, underscoring their value as predictors of prostate cancer progression. Notably, those with UH experienced earlier BCR and had a faster PSADT, which raises possible differences in post-RP follow-up and management. Clinical characteristics by histology type. Characteristic Overall n = 844 Favorable Histology n = 361 Unfavorable Histology n = 483 p-value Age at surgery (yrs) 61 (57, 66) 60 (56, 64) 63 (58, 67) <0.001 Initial PSA before surgery (ng/mL) 6.0 (4.5, 9.2) 5.2 (4.2, 6.7) 6.9 (4.9, 11.0) <0.001 Margin Status <0.001 Positive 301 (37%) 96 (28%) 205 (44%) Pathological T Stage <0.001 T2 434 (51%) 267 (74%) 167 (35%) T3 410 (49%) 94 (26%) 316 (65%) Grade Group <0.001 0-1 15 (1.8%) 15 (4.2%) 0 (0%) 2 545 (65%) 337 (93%) 208 (43%) 3 162 (19%) 9 (2.5%) 153 (32%) 4-5 122 (14%) 0 (0%) 122 (25%)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (14)
Kristina Dortche
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Jane K. Nguyen
Center for Urologic Oncology, Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Jesse McKenney
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Kamilla Abdurakhmanov
2Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, United States
Gagan Fervaha
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Mohamad Watfa
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Salim Younis
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Abdulrahman Al-Bayati
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Betty Wang
Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Samuel Haywood
Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
Ruben Olivares
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Jihad Kaouk
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
Christopher Weight
Zeyad Schwen
Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH