Hormone therapy use and duration with post-operative radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

A Amar Upadhyaya Kishan (Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) Y Yilun Sun (Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Drug Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine) C Chris Parker (Uro‐Oncology Unit The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust Sutton and London UK) M Matthew R. Sydes P Paul Henri Sargos (Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) S Sylvie Chabaud (Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France) M Meryem Brihoum (Unicancer, Paris, France) P Pascal Pommier (Centre de lutte contre le cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon, France) L Luca Faustino Valle (Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) S Soumyajit Roy M Michael L. Steinberg (Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) A Angela Y. Jia J Jason A. Efstathiou (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) J James J. Dignam (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL) A Alan Pollack (University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL) H Howard M. Sandler (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) P Paul Nguyen (Department of Physics, University of Washington 2 , Seattle, Washington 98195,) D Daniel Eidelberg Spratt (University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH)

Abstract

305 Background: Addition of hormonal therapy (HT) to definitive radiotherapy (RT) in localized prostate cancer improves overall survival (OS). However, the effect of HT on OS when added to post-operative RT (PORT) after radical prostatectomy is less clear. Herein, we report an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomized trials to quantify the benefit of adding HT to PORT. Methods: The POSEIDON meta-analysis was an IPD meta-analysis of randomized phase 3 trials of PORT±HT utilizing IPD from the MARCAP consortium. The primary outcome was OS. Meta-analyses evaluated the benefit of HT to PORT, addition of short-term HT (ST-HT, 4-6 months), or addition of long-term HT (LT-HT, 24 months) to PORT. Tests for interaction based on pre-PORT PSA and duration of HT were evaluated and non-linear associations between pre-PORT PSA and OS were modeled with cubic splines. Results: Six phase 3 trials were eligible for inclusion in our analysis and had IPD available (6057 patients, median follow-up of 9.02 years). The addition of HT to RT did not improve OS (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76-1.01, p=0.06). There was no significant interaction between duration of HT and this effect (p-interaction 0.25), though there was a significant interaction based on pre-PORT PSA >0.5 ng/mL vs. ≤0.5 ng/mL (p-interaction 0.02). For all pre-PORT PSA values, the upper bounds of the 95% CI of the hazard ratio for OS crossed 1 for patients randomized to ±ST-HT (n=3938). For patients randomized to ±LT-HT (n=1088), the upper bounds of the 95% CI for OS fell below 1.0 at PSA >1.6 ng/mL. Conclusions: Our findings provide the strongest level of evidence to date to suggest there is no meaningful OS benefit to adding HT, either ST- or LT-HT, to PORT for PSA <0.5 ng/mL in biomarker unselected patients, with no apparent difference in efficacy for ST-HT versus LT-HT.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 305-305
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

A

Amar Upadhyaya Kishan

Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

Y

Yilun Sun

Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Drug Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine

C

Chris Parker

Uro‐Oncology Unit The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust Sutton and London UK

M

Matthew R. Sydes

P

Paul Henri Sargos

Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

S

Sylvie Chabaud

Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

M

Meryem Brihoum

Unicancer, Paris, France

P

Pascal Pommier

Centre de lutte contre le cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

L

Luca Faustino Valle

Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

S

Soumyajit Roy

M

Michael L. Steinberg

Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

A

Angela Y. Jia

J

Jason A. Efstathiou

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

J

James J. Dignam

University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

A

Alan Pollack

University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL

H

Howard M. Sandler

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

P

Paul Nguyen

Department of Physics, University of Washington 2 , Seattle, Washington 98195,

D

Daniel Eidelberg Spratt

University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH