I-SPY2 endocrine optimization pilot (EOP): Neoadjuvant lasofoxifene (Laso) in molecularly selected patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative (HER2-) stage 2/3 breast cancer (BC).

M Mei Wei A Anthony D. Elias (University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO) K Karthik Giridhar (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) M Matthew P. Goetz R Rita Mukhtar (Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) C Christos Vaklavas (Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) L Laura van t Veer (Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) S Silver Alkhafaji (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) G Gillian L. Hirst H Hope S. Rugo (City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA) N Nan Chen (National Engineering Research Center of Lower-Carbon Catalysis Technology, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics) W W. Fraser Fraser Symmans (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Houston, TX) A Alexander D. Borowsky L Lamorna Brown Swigart (University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA) N Natsuko Onishi (University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) D Douglas Yee N Nola Hylton (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) L Laura Esserman (Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) J Jo Chien (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA)

Abstract

612 Background: EOP, an I-SPY2 sub-study, evaluates the tolerability and activity of novel endocrine strategies in stage 2/3 breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) predicted to have lower chemotherapy benefit. Laso, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), has shown favorable toxicity profile and activity in HR+/HER2- endocrine-resistant metastatic BC. Methods: Pts with Stage 2/3 HR+/HER2-, MammaPrint (MP) low risk BC were enrolled. Pts with MP High1 BC were included if clinically node-negative. Pts received oral laso 5 mg daily for six 28-day cycles. Laso was continued until the day prior to surgery. Premenopausal pts received ovarian function suppression (OFS) starting C2D1. The primary endpoint was feasibility (>75% of patients completing >75% study therapy). Baseline (T0), 3-wk (T1) biopsies, and the surgical specimen (T3) was assessed centrally for Ki-67. Breast MRI functional tumor volume (FTV) was performed at T0, T1, 12 weeks (T2), and pre-operatively (T3). Blood was collected for tumor informed ctDNA at T0, T1, T2, T3. Advance event (AE) was assessed using CTCAE V5. Results: From 3/2023 to 5/2024, 20 pts were enrolled. Median age 50.5 years, 50% premenopausal, and 1 male pt. 60% cN0, 80% MP low-risk signature. 18 (90%) pts completed >75% study therapy. Two pts discontinued treatment due to pt preference. Median Ki67 at T0 was 14.7%. At T1, 87.5% of pts remained or suppressed Ki67 to <10% and 37.5% suppressed to <2.7%. Ki67 at T1 was similar between pre-and postmenopausal pts despite OFS (Table). The median MRI FTV was 8.4 cc at T0, and 3.4 cc at T3. Median % FTV reduction from T0 to T3 was -47.5%. 2/20 pts (10%) achieved a modified PEPI score of 0. No patients achieved completed pathological response. Of the 16 pts with RCB results, 2 (12.5%) RCB-1, 6 (37.5%) RCB-2, 8 (50%) RCB-3 disease. 14 pts had ctDNA available at T0. 4/14 were ctDNA+ at T0, 2 of whom became ctDNA negative, and 2 remained ctDNA+. 10/14 pts were ctDNA negative at T0, 8 of whom remained negative, 2 became positive at T1 then cleared. All AEs were grade(G) 1 except 1 pt with G2 hot flashes. Most common AEs include hot flashes (85%), constipation (50%), fatigue (50%), and nausea (35%). One pt had G3 hypersensitivity and hypertension, both unrelated to therapy. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant laso demonstrates a favorable AE profile and promising anti-tumor activity in suppressing 3-wk Ki67 and MRI FTV change in pts with HR+ HER2-negative early BC. Ki67 suppression in premenopausal pts was seen in the absence of OFS. Clinical trial information: NCT01042379 . Ki67 expression at pre-treatment, and 3-wk time point. All Patients(n=20) Premenopausal (n=10) Postmenopausal (n=9) Median Ki67 expression Baseline 10.0% 12.5% 10.0% 3-wk 5.1% 3.0% 6.0% Number of pts with Ki67 expression <10% at 3-wk 87.5% 1 87.5% 85.7% Number of pts with Ki67 expression <2.7% at 3-wk 37.5% 50% 28.6% 1 Include the one male pt.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 612-612
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

M

Mei Wei

A

Anthony D. Elias

University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

K

Karthik Giridhar

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

M

Matthew P. Goetz

R

Rita Mukhtar

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

C

Christos Vaklavas

Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

L

Laura van t Veer

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

S

Silver Alkhafaji

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

G

Gillian L. Hirst

H

Hope S. Rugo

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA

N

Nan Chen

National Engineering Research Center of Lower-Carbon Catalysis Technology, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics

W

W. Fraser Fraser Symmans

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Houston, TX

A

Alexander D. Borowsky

L

Lamorna Brown Swigart

University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

N

Natsuko Onishi

University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

D

Douglas Yee

N

Nola Hylton

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

L

Laura Esserman

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

J

Jo Chien

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA