Identifying and predicting non-cancer mortality risk in mHSPC following doublet therapy in the STAMPEDE trial.

O Omar El-Taji (Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom) S Struan Gray (Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom) D Donal Michael McSweeney (Radiotherapy Related Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom) M Mick D. Brown (GenitoUrinary Cancer Research Group, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom) L Louise C. Brown (Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom) G Gerhardt Attard M Mahesh M.K. Parmar (Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom) N Nicholas David James (The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom) J John Garrett P Perry J. Pickhardt A Ashwin Sachdeva (Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom) N Noel W. Clarke (Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom)

Abstract

134 Background: Body composition features derived from baseline computed tomography (CT) imaging can reveal clinical phenotypes which inform non-cancer mortality (NCM) risk in M1 HSPC. We measured the prognostic and predictive value of body composition phenotypes for NCM within the STAMPEDE Docetaxel (DOC) and Abiraterone (AAP) comparisons. Methods: A fully automated image analysis programme quantified body composition features from baseline CT scans in M1 patients recruited to STAMPEDE’s DOC and AAP comparisons. Random Forest feature importance identified six key imaging biomarkers: abdominal aortic calcium, bone mineral density, visceral adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue: subcutaneous adipose tissue ratio, skeletal muscle area, and intramuscular adipose tissue. Unsupervised Gaussian mixture modelling defined three distinct phenotypic clusters. Fine-Gray competing-risk models, adjusted for age, WHO performance status, treatment, NSAID use, PSA, and Gleason grade group, evaluated the prognostic utility of cluster phenotypes for NCM. Predictive models incorporated cluster × treatment interaction terms to assess effect modification by therapy. Flexible parametric models generated 10-year cumulative incidence. Results: Among 937 men (docetaxel comparison: n=534; abiraterone comparison: n=553; n=150 contemporaneously recruited), median follow-up of 7.6 years, three distinct body composition phenotypes were identified: cardiovascular (high calcification, sarcopenia; n=163), reference (preserved muscle and bone; n=543), and metabolic (myosteatosis, visceral adiposity; n=231) phenotypes. Both adverse phenotypes predicted higher NCM versus the reference phenotype after adjustment for treatment and clinical factors: CV phenotype SDHR=2.08 (95% CI 1.23-3.52; p=0.006) and metabolic phenotype SDHR=1.75 (1.07-2.87; p=0.026). Age predicted NCM independently (SDHR=1.07 per year; p<0.001). A significant phenotype×AAP interaction revealed excess NCM risk in the metabolic phenotype (SDHR=3.78, 1.25-11.4; p=0.019). Ten-year NCM exceeded 20% in high-risk phenotypes versus <10% in the reference phenotype. Conclusions: CT body composition phenotypes from routine staging scans independently predict NCM following combination therapies in mHSPC identifying patients with metabolic phenotypes who experience excess mortality risk with AAP intensification. These findings support the role of imaging biomarkers in guiding personalised risk stratification and treatment selection.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 134-134
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

O

Omar El-Taji

Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom

S

Struan Gray

Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom

D

Donal Michael McSweeney

Radiotherapy Related Research, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

M

Mick D. Brown

GenitoUrinary Cancer Research Group, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

L

Louise C. Brown

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom

G

Gerhardt Attard

M

Mahesh M.K. Parmar

Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom

N

Nicholas David James

The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

J

John Garrett

P

Perry J. Pickhardt

A

Ashwin Sachdeva

Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

N

Noel W. Clarke

Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trusts, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom