Immunotherapy and the sequence relative to survival outcomes in SCLC: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

D Dan Yao Y Yinting Liu (University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE) W Wenyao Yu (Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, CA) S Sisi Zheng (1Yale University, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, New Haven, United States) L Lujie Huang (Division of Pulmonary Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Interdiscipline and Translational Medicine, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Heart and Lung, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China) M Mengsi Cai (Division of Pulmonary Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Interdiscipline and Translational Medicine, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Heart and Lung, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China) Y Yan Zhuang (The State Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Modulation Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Institute of Ecology, Peking University) Y Youwen He (Department of Integrative lmmunobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC) X Xiaoying Huang

Abstract

e20123 Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains an aggressive malignancy with limited therapeutic progress over the past decades. It remains unclear how the sequence of immunotherapy influences overall survival (OS)in SCLC, we performed a population-based analysis using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate its association with survival. Methods: Patients with SCLC diagnosed in the NCDB from 2016 to 2021 were identified to evaluate the impact of immunotherapy on OS. Among patients with ES-SCLC, we conducted subsequent analyses to clarify the relationship between the sequence of immunotherapy and OS in the context of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Results: Among 69,820 eligible patients, 9,242 received CRT+immuno, and 11,755 received Chemo+immuno. In the overall population, adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy or CRT was associated with modestly improved survival. In ES-SCLC, immunotherapy was consistently associated with longer survival in both the Chemo and CRT cohort, while addition of immunotherapy didn’t confer benefit in LS-SCLC. Within the ES-SCLC Chemo+immuno cohort, altering the initiated immunotherapy interval (0–90 days) didn’t show any meaningful difference in survival. By contrast, in CRT+immuno cohort, survival showed benefit in a time-dependent pattern: patients who initiated immunotherapy within 4-7 days after CRT had the survival trend, which was consistent with the proposed immune activation window. Conclusions: This real-world analysis suggests that immunotherapy was associated with longer survival in ES-SCLC, CRT+immuno is associated with improved OS with a more obvious survival benefit when ICIs are initiated within 4-7 days after CRT. These findings hint the potential importance of immunotherapy sequence and warrant further prospective validation.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

D

Dan Yao

Y

Yinting Liu

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

W

Wenyao Yu

Department of Mathematics, University of California, San Diego, CA

S

Sisi Zheng

1Yale University, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, New Haven, United States

L

Lujie Huang

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Interdiscipline and Translational Medicine, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Heart and Lung, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

M

Mengsi Cai

Division of Pulmonary Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Interdiscipline and Translational Medicine, Wenzhou Key Laboratory of Heart and Lung, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China

Y

Yan Zhuang

The State Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Modulation Research, School of Life Sciences, Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Institute of Ecology, Peking University

Y

Youwen He

Department of Integrative lmmunobiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

X

Xiaoying Huang