Impact of a collaborative care-based symptom intervention model on chemotherapy adherence in patients with breast cancer.
Abstract
1543 Background: Treatment toxicity may limit the ability of cancer patients to receive all recommended cycles of therapy. Four to six cycles of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (TC) is a common adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer. We assessed the impact of routine collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), coupled with a collaborative care model-based symptom management intervention, on the number of cycles of TC received by patients with breast cancer. Methods: The Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) trial was a cluster-randomized, pragmatic clinical trial, conducted between March 2019 and January 2023 at Mayo Clinic Rochester and within the Mayo Clinic Health System in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Patients regularly reported the severity of 6 SPPADE symptoms (Sleep deficit, Pain, Physical function impairment, Anxiety, Depression, and Energy deficit/fatigue) on 11-point numerical rating scales. Each symptom score was interpreted as none to mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), or severe (7-10). The E2C2 intervention included symptom management education modules, clinician decision support aids, and the option to discuss severe symptoms with a nurse, physical therapist, or social worker. Patients with breast cancer who received at least one cycle of TC were included in this analysis. We compared the number of cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide completed by patients in the control condition versus those in the intervention condition. Results: We identified 198 patients with breast cancer who received TC during the control condition and 128 who received TC during the intervention condition. Median age was 61.3 years in the control group and 60.3 years in the intervention group, and 94% and 95% were white, respectively. Those receiving treatment during the control condition, on average, completed 3.53 cycles of docetaxel, while those receiving TC during the intervention condition completed 3.77 cycles ( p = 0.014). Seventy-eight percent in the control group completed at least 4 cycles of docetaxel, compared to 84% in the intervention group. Those receiving TC during the control condition completed an average of 3.71 cycles of cyclophosphamide, compared to 3.78 cycles in the intervention condition (p = 0.231). Eighty-four percent of patients in the control group and 86% in the intervention group completed at least 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide. Conclusions: Routine PRO surveillance, coupled with guideline-based collaborative care interventions, was associated with completion of a greater number of cycles of docetaxel. These findings suggest that routine symptom surveillance and management may enhance the docetaxel tolerance profile and improve treatment adherence in patients with early-stage breast cancer, allowing for delivery of an optimized treatment course.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Michael H. Storandt
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Kathryn Jean Ruddy
Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Veronica Grzegorczyk
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Kurt Kroenke
Indiana University School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN
Michael J. Hassett
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Jacob Greenmyer
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Sandra A. Mitchell
3Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Outcomes Research Branch, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD
Ashley Wilder Smith
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Deirdre R. Pachman
Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Andrea L. Cheville
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN