Impact of baseline alterations in HER2-pathway oncogenic drivers on response to anti-HER2 therapy in patients (pts) with HER2-amplified advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC).
Abstract
243 Background: HER2-amplified aCRC is associated with poor prognosis despite new anti-HER2 regimens. Insight on biomarkers that predict response to these therapies is limited. This study aims to evaluate whether baseline alterations in oncogenic drivers along the HER2 pathway predict response to anti-HER2 therapy in HER2-amplified aCRC. Methods: In this international multi-center study involving Mayo Clinic, Duke Cancer Institute and National Cancer Center Hospital East (Japan), we collected baseline genomic alterations from tissue or blood samples using next-generation sequencing (NGS) prior to anti-HER2 therapy initiation. We defined PIK3CA, RAS, RAF, MAP2K, and MET as oncogenic drivers of resistance within the HER2 pathway. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method and a log-rank test was used to compare median OS (mOS) between pts with and without alterations in the above genes. A chi-square test (significance level 0.05) was performed to compare overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: We identified 39 pts with HER2-amplified aCRC and baseline NGS. Median age was 57 (range 30-77), 54% were male. Baseline alterations in HER2 pathway oncogenic drivers were identified in 17 pts (43.5%). 18 (46%) received monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 12 (30%) received dual mAbs and 7 (18%) received trastuzumab deruxtecan. The mOS was 41.9 months (mos) (95%CI 23.7-60.1) for other alterations vs 24.2 mos (95%CI 14.1-34.3) in pts with HER2 pathway alterations (p = 0.1). ORR was 47% vs 41% (p = 0.7) and DCR 82% vs 73% (p = 0.4), for pts with HER2 pathway alterations and without HER2 pathway alterations, respectively. 4 pts receiving trastuzumab/tucatinib had complete response, none of which had HER2 pathway alterations. Conclusions: Pts with baseline alterations in oncogenic drivers of the HER2 pathway had clinically worse outcomes compared to pts without such alterations despite receiving HER2-targeted therapy, though results lacked statistical significance. Larger studies are needed to confirm the lack of benefit from anti-HER2 therapy in this subgroup.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Celine Hoyek
Division of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Angelo Pirozzi
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Binbin Zheng-Lin
Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Portland, OR
Oluseyi Abidoye
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Cody Eslinger
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Yoshiaki Nakamura
Ryne Ramaker
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
Mohamad Bassam Sonbol
Christina Wu
Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
Mitesh J. Borad
Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
Daniel H. Ahn
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
Masafumi Ikeda
Taro Shibuki
Takayuki Yoshino
National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
John H Strickler
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab