Impact of robot-assisted surgery on postoperative sexual function in younger male rectal cancer patients.
Abstract
63 Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate postoperative sexual dysfunction in male rectal cancer patients aged ≤60 years. Methods: This was a subgroup analysis of the multicenter prospective observational study, the LANDMARC study (“Postoperative Sexual Dysfunction after Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer”). Male patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery (Lap group), robot-assisted surgery (Ro group), or transanal excision were included. Sexual function was assessed using the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) and the ejaculation function questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR38). At 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, the incidence of erectile dysfunction (ErD), ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD), potency impairment (defined as a preoperative EHS ≥3 decreasing to ≤2 postoperatively), and overall sexual dysfunction (SD = ErD + EjD) was compared between the Lap and Ro groups. Results: Male patients ≤60 years were analyzed: Lap group (n=76), Ro group (n=103). No significant differences were observed between groups in ASA-PS, tumor location, T factor, N factor, preoperative treatment rate, operative procedures, or rate of lateral lymph node dissection. ErD incidence: 3 months (44.7% vs 35.0%, p=0.22), 6 months (35.0% vs 28.9%, p=0.42), 12 months (33.8% vs 23.5%, p=0.17). EjD incidence: 3 months (53.3% vs 31.3%, p=0.03), 6 months (41.7% vs 21.1%, p=0.02), 12 months (44.9% vs 17.4%, p=0.002). Potency impairment: 3 months (22.4% vs 13.5%, p=0.15), 6 months (24.3% vs 13.5%, p=0.10), 12 months (22.9% vs 8.8%, p=0.02). SD incidence: 3 months (57.0% vs 43.3%, p=0.07), 6 months (47.5% vs 37.5%, p=0.17), 12 months (50.0% vs 26.3%, p=0.002). Multivariate analysis for sexual dysfunction (ErD + EjD) at 12 months postoperatively identified laparoscopic surgery as an independent risk factor (HR 2.34; 95% CI 1.17–4.65; p=0.01). Conclusions: Robot-assisted surgery appears to be beneficial for sexual function preservation in male rectal cancer patients aged ≤60 years. Clinical trial information: UMIN000037367 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Akio Shiomi
Yusuke Yamaoka
Shizuoka Cancer Center, Sunto-Gun, Japan
Shoichi Manabe
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
Shunsuke Kasai
Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
Yusuke Tanaka
Masakatsu Numata
Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Sagamihara, Japan
Tomohiro Yamaguchi
School of Advanced Engineering and Department of Electrical Engineering and Electronics Graduate School of Engineering, Kogakuin University 3 , Tokyo 192-0015,
Koya Hida
Tomonori Akagi
Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Sagamihara, Japan
Yusuke Kinugasa
Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroyasu Kagawa
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Ryo Inada
Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
Manabu Shiozawa
Keisuke Kazama
Masanori Hotchi
Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Sagamihara, Japan
Masahiko Watanabe
Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University
Takeshi Naitoh
Department of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan