International Consensus-Driven Recommendations for Patient-Reported Outcome Research Objectives in Early Phase Dose-Finding Oncology Trials: OPTIMISE-ROR
Abstract
PURPOSE There is growing scientific interest in incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in early phase dose-finding oncology trials (DFOTs) to assess tolerability, inform dose selection, and guide later stage trial design. However, research indicates that PRO objectives in DFOTs are often unclear. The Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dose-Finding Trials-Research Objectives Recommendations (OPTIMISE-ROR) project was established to support trialists to effectively incorporate PROs into DFOTs. METHODS Using the Enhancing Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) Network's methodological framework, guideline development included the following: (1) a methodological review of published DFOTs incorporating PROs; (2) candidate item generation, refined through expert consultation; (3) a two-round international multistakeholder Delphi survey (N = 109 in Round 1 [October 2024]; N = 96 in Round 2 [December 2024]); and (4) an independently chaired virtual consensus meeting (N = 31; January 2025) where multidisciplinary, international experts reviewed and voted to finalize items for inclusion. RESULTS Consensus was reached on six recommendations emphasizing three core PRO tolerability concepts: overall side effect impact, symptomatic adverse events, and overall health-related quality of life. The integration of PROs to inform final dose recommendations in dose escalation and optimization trials should be considered, regardless of trial design. The recommendations highlight the importance of PRO data analysis over time and across dose levels, defining PRO research objectives as descriptive or statistically powered, and assessing PRO-related end points to guide end point selection for subsequent studies. CONCLUSION This foundational guidance outlines key PRO research objectives in DFOTs. By facilitating the systematic integration of PROs, this guidance supports the utilization of patient-centered evidence for the tolerability and efficacy assessment of therapies to inform dose escalation, optimization, and regulatory evaluation—ultimately contributing to the development of safer, more effective therapies.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (34)
Emily Alger
Clinical Trial and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
Amylou C. Dueck
Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
Anna Minchom
Royal Marsden Hospital/Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
Madeline Pe
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
John D. Peipert
Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Claire Snyder
Stefan N. Symeonides
Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Roger Wilson
Cancer Research Advocates Forum UK, Stevenage, United Kingdom
Ethan Basch
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
Yu Qiao
Susan E. Bates
Helen Bulbeck
Lizzie Dean
Cancer Research Advocates Forum UK, Stevenage, United Kingdom
Massimo Di Maio
Aaron R. Hansen
Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
Olga Kholmanskikh
Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussel, Belgium
Ken Kobayashi
Dónal Landers
Early Clinical Development, Dukes Street Bio Ltd, London, United Kingdom
Christophe Le Tourneau
Institut Curie, Paris
J. Jack Lee
Brigette B.Y. Ma
Phase 1 Clinical Trial Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
Lynley V. Marshall
Children & Young People's Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Sheetal Patel
Joan Petrie
Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG), Kingston, ON, Canada
Gregory R. Pond
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Kieran Prior
Cancer Research UK, London, United Kingdom
Khadija R. Rantell
Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, United Kingdom
John F. Reeve
Cancer Research Advocates Forum UK, Stevenage, United Kingdom
Olga Solovyeva
Clinical Trial and Statistics Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
Nolan A. Wages
Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Harald A. Weber
Pfizer AG, Zug, Switzerland
Melanie J. Calvert
Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Christina Yap