Intra-patient comparison of urinary radioactivity after <sup>18</sup> F-piflufolastat and <sup>18</sup> F-flotufolastat PET in men with low PSA biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who have had radical prostatectomy.

J Jack Andrews (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ) D David Josephson (Tower Urology, Los Angeles, CA) D Daniel R. Saltzstein (Urology San Antonio, San Antonio, TX) A Andrei Purysko (Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) N Neal D. Shore (START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC) B Benjamin Gartrell (Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY) R Ram Pathak (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) P Phillip H. Kuo (Department of Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA) J James Sykes P Phillip Davis B Brian T. Helfand (Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL)

Abstract

TPS272 Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals enable early detection of metastatic and recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). High urinary radioactivity of some PSMA-PET agents can affect interpretation of scans in the pelvic region (prostate/prostate bed [PB]; pelvic lymph nodes [PLN]). 18 F-Piflufolastat and 18 F-flotufolastat are FDA-approved, mainly renally cleared, diagnostic PSMA-PET agents; data suggest 18 F-flotufolastat has lower urinary radioactivity than 18 F-piflufolastat, but no clinical differences have been confirmed by head-to-head intra-patient studies. The present study will directly compare the urinary radioactivity of 18 F-piflufolastat with 18 F-flotufolastat in men with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: This multicenter, prospective, intra-patient comparator study will include men (≥ 18 years old) with low PSA (≤ 0.5 ng/mL) BCR of PCa who have had RP ≥ 6 months before enrollment (with undetectable PSA post surgery) and are due to have routine 18 F-piflufolastat PET. Men who have had prior 18 F-piflufolastat PET or salvage therapy, or with conditions affecting urinary output, will be excluded. Eligible patients will undergo 18 F-piflufolastat PET followed by 18 F-flotufolastat PET ≥ 24 hours but ≤ 10 days later. No diuretic will be administered for scanning purposes. Each radiopharmaceutical will be administered as a single intravenous bolus per approved US prescribing information (USPI). Scanning (with the same scanner for both scans) will start 50–90 minutes post injection of 18 F-piflufolastat and 50–70 minutes post injection of 18 F-flotufolastat. Each patient will be their own control. The primary endpoint will be difference in mean standardized uptake value (SUV mean ) between 18 F-piflufolastat and 18 F-flotufolastat as assessed in volumes of interest drawn on the urinary bladder. Secondary endpoints for both agents will include detection rates: at the patient level (overall; by baseline PSA); for local recurrences in PB subregions; and for PLN lesions. For secondary endpoints, PET scans will be interpreted per product-specific USPI by 2 specially trained, blinded, central readers (a third reader will adjudicate disagreements). Safety will be monitored until 24 hours after the second scan. Around 60 men will be screened and ≥ 52 with evaluable PET scans for both agents will be included in the primary analysis. The primary endpoint will be assessed for normality and a difference in SUV mean will be tested using 2-sided paired tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank test [non-normal]; t-test [normal]). All further endpoints, including safety, will be summarized descriptively. The trial has been open for enrollment since 10/24. Clinical trial information: NCT06604442 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

J

Jack Andrews

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ

D

David Josephson

Tower Urology, Los Angeles, CA

D

Daniel R. Saltzstein

Urology San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

A

Andrei Purysko

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

N

Neal D. Shore

START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC

B

Benjamin Gartrell

Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY

R

Ram Pathak

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

P

Phillip H. Kuo

Department of Radiology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA

J

James Sykes

P

Phillip Davis

B

Brian T. Helfand

Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL