Investigation of Profile-Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy (I-PREDICT) N-of-1 Precision Oncology Study: Molecular Profiling to Match Individually Dosed, Personalized Drug Combinations

J Jason K. Sicklick (Moores Cancer Center University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA) D Daisuke Nishizaki (Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA) H Hirotaka Miyashita (3Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, United States) R Ryosuke Okamura M Michael E. Hahn M Mina Nikanjam (Division of Hematology‐Oncology University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA) P Paul T. Fanta (University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA) D David E. Piccioni (Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA) H Hitendra Patel (UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA) R Ramez N. Eskander R Rana R. McKay (Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA) J Jeffrey S. Ross (4Foundation Medicine, Cambrige, United States) J J. Jack Lee S Scott M. Lippman (Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA) S Shumei Kato (Division of Hematology‐Oncology University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA) R Razelle Kurzrock (Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center Milwaukee Wisconsin USA)

Abstract

PURPOSE Malignancies have complex and distinct molecular profiles that may not segregate by tumor type. However, most precision oncology treatments are matched to a single biomarker. We aimed to optimize therapy for advanced cancers using individually dosed drug regimens customized to cotarget multiple molecular alterations. METHODS Investigation of Profile-Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy (I-PREDICT; NCT02534675 ) is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multidepartment/pan-cancer trial for aggressive advanced/metastatic malignancies. Patients had tissue and/or blood next-generation sequencing (NGS; Foundation Medicine). A molecular tumor board made suggestions. Degree of biomarker matching to drugs given was calculated by a matching score (MS; broadly, number of pathogenic alterations targeted divided by total pathogenic alterations). RESULTS Overall, 210 evaluable patients (n = 456 consented) received ≥1 US Food and Drug Administration–approved drug (mostly off label) after NGS. Median number of pathogenic alterations/tumor was five (range, 0-20); approximately 95% of patients had unique molecular landscapes. Consistent with I-PREDICT's objective to optimize/tailor treatment for each patient, we administered 157 different regimens (including 103 personalized combinations without established safety/dosing data). For previously unstudied combinations, starting doses were reduced and titrated to tolerance (intrapatient dose-finding); only 6.5% experienced Grade 3/4 drug-related toxicities ( v 15.5% of those receiving established regimens). Higher disease control rate (stable disease ≥6 months/objective response), and longer progression-free survival and overall survival correlated significantly/independently/linearly with greater degrees of drug matching to alterations (higher MS), but did not vary by drug number or dosages. CONCLUSION The I-PREDICT strategy of maximizing personalized biomarker matching with individually dosed customized drug combinations enabled safe and active N-of-1 matched treatment, including regimens previously unstudied in Phase I trials. I-PREDICT represents a blueprint for a new personalized precision oncology paradigm, which merits validation via additional prospective trials.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 540-552
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

J

Jason K. Sicklick

Moores Cancer Center University of California San Diego Health La Jolla California USA

D

Daisuke Nishizaki

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA

H

Hirotaka Miyashita

3Dartmouth Cancer Center, Lebanon, United States

R

Ryosuke Okamura

M

Michael E. Hahn

M

Mina Nikanjam

Division of Hematology‐Oncology University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

P

Paul T. Fanta

University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

D

David E. Piccioni

Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA

H

Hitendra Patel

UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA

R

Ramez N. Eskander

R

Rana R. McKay

Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA

J

Jeffrey S. Ross

4Foundation Medicine, Cambrige, United States

J

J. Jack Lee

S

Scott M. Lippman

Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA

S

Shumei Kato

Division of Hematology‐Oncology University of California San Diego La Jolla California USA

R

Razelle Kurzrock

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center Milwaukee Wisconsin USA