Large genomic rearrangements in germline <i>BRCA1/2</i> pathogenic variant architecture across tumor types.

A Ankur Nandan Varshney (Medanta, The Medicity, Noida, India) S Shriniwas Subhash Kulkarni (Sahyadri Hospital, Pune, India) P Pradip Kumar Mondal (Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste, Basovizza Trieste Italy) K Kumar Saurabh A Ankit Jain A Ashish Upadhyay (Fortis Hospital, Kolkata, India) D Darshana Suresh Patil (Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India) R Rajan Datar (Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India) F Felix Melchior (Datar Cancer Genetics Europe GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany) S Sneha Datar (Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India) N Neha Shaikh (Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India) D David Reismann (Datar Cancer Genetics Europe GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany) M Mridul Malhotra (Manipal Hospital, Dwarka, New Delhi, India) A Allwin George (AKG Memorial Cooperative Hospital, Kannur, India) S Shivam Shingla (S.L. Raheja, Mumbai, India) S Satya Pal Kataria (Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India) S Shiroma De Silva-Minor (Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom)

Abstract

e22636 Background: Germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variation is structurally heterogeneous, comprising small sequence variants and large genomic rearrangements that differ in their genomic architecture and biological consequences. Real-world data defining the contribution of these variant classes across BRCA genes and tumor types remain limited. Methods: We analyzed germline BRCA1/2 findings from 3,248 individuals undergoing comprehensive hereditary cancer testing for small sequence variants (single nucleotide variants and short insertions/deletions) and large genomic rearrangements (deletions and duplications) using a multigene panel. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were classified using standard criteria and evaluated by gene, variant class, tumor type, and clinical actionability. Results: Overall, pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA variants were identified in 8.9% (288/3,248) of individuals. Small sequence variants were identified in 258 individuals, while large genomic rearrangements were identified in 39 individuals, with 9 individuals harboring both variant types. At the cohort level, this corresponds to approximately one pathogenic BRCA large genomic rearrangement per 83 individuals analyzed. Among BRCA -positive cases, 58% (167/288) involved BRCA1 and 42% (122/288) involved BRCA2 , with one individual carrying pathogenic variants in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 . Variant-level analysis revealed that large genomic rearrangements were more frequent in BRCA1 than BRCA2 (15.2% vs 10.2%), with deletions predominating over duplications (82.1% vs 17.9%). BRCA pathogenic variants demonstrated marked enrichment in ovarian cancer (16.1%, 77/477), compared with breast (7.7%, 118/1,541), prostate (4.4%, 11/250), and pancreatic cancers (4.1%, 15/362).Large genomic rearrangements were also most prevalent in ovarian cancer (2.1%), compared with breast (1.0%), prostate (0.8%), pancreatic (0.6%), indicating relative enrichment of rearrangements in ovarian tumors. Pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes were identified in 14.6% (475/3248) of individuals, with non- BRCA genes accounting for 41.7% of findings. Overall, 12.1% of individuals harbored germline alterations with direct therapeutic relevance including eligibility for PARP inhibitor therapy. Conclusions: Large genomic rearrangements constitute a non-trivial component of germline BRCA pathogenic variation, show preferential involvement of BRCA1 , and demonstrate enrichment in ovarian cancer, consistent with HRD-driven tumor biology. Together, these findings provide population-level insight into pathogenic germline alterations across BRCA and other therapeutically relevant hereditary predisposition genes, underscoring the broader relevance of inherited cancer susceptibility in informing targeted and immunotherapy strategies within precision oncology.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Ankur Nandan Varshney

Medanta, The Medicity, Noida, India

S

Shriniwas Subhash Kulkarni

Sahyadri Hospital, Pune, India

P

Pradip Kumar Mondal

Elettra – Sincrotrone Trieste, Basovizza Trieste Italy

K

Kumar Saurabh

A

Ankit Jain

A

Ashish Upadhyay

Fortis Hospital, Kolkata, India

D

Darshana Suresh Patil

Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India

R

Rajan Datar

Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India

F

Felix Melchior

Datar Cancer Genetics Europe GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany

S

Sneha Datar

Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India

N

Neha Shaikh

Datar Cancer Genetics, Nashik, India

D

David Reismann

Datar Cancer Genetics Europe GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany

M

Mridul Malhotra

Manipal Hospital, Dwarka, New Delhi, India

A

Allwin George

AKG Memorial Cooperative Hospital, Kannur, India

S

Shivam Shingla

S.L. Raheja, Mumbai, India

S

Satya Pal Kataria

Medanta, The Medicity, Gurugram, India

S

Shiroma De Silva-Minor

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom