Lightweight All‐Solid‐State Pouch Cells Freed from High Stack Pressure

Y Yue Gong Y Yue Ji S Shuangquan Lin (Solid‐State Batteries Research Center GRINM (Guangdong) Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology Foshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Electrochemical Functional Materials and Technology Foshan Guangdong P. R. China) T Tengjiao Luan (Solid‐State Batteries Research Center GRINM (Guangdong) Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology Foshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Electrochemical Functional Materials and Technology Foshan Guangdong P. R. China) S Shuaike Wang (Solid‐State Batteries Research Center GRINM (Guangdong) Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology Foshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Electrochemical Functional Materials and Technology Foshan Guangdong P. R. China) Y Yu Xia Y Yingying Jiang X Xiaona Li (Eastern Institute for Advanced Study, Ningbo Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery) J Jianwen Liang D Dawei Wang (Lehn Institute of Functional Materials, GBRCE for Functional Molecular Engineering, IGCME, School of Chemistry) X Xueliang Sun C Changtai Zhao (National Power Battery Innovation Center)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Since 2011, ionic conductivity of some sulfide‐ and halide‐based solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) have already reached a level comparable to that of liquid electrolytes. Numerous companies worldwide have proposed diverse technical pathways for commercializing electric vehicles with ultra‐long driving ranges. However, the practical vehicular application of all‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) remains highly challenging and uncertain. One of the major obstacles is the requirement for high stack pressure, which typically relies on heavy metallic plates and thereby reduces the overall energy density of the module battery. This perspective compares practical all‐solid‐state pouch cells (ASSPCs) with conventional liquid batteries to analyze the origins of stack pressure requirements. The analysis is conducted from material, interfacial, and structural viewpoints, revealing the critical factors underlying this limitation. Subsequently, strategies are proposed to mitigate stack pressure from the current 20 MPa to 5 MPa for the first stage and to 2 MPa as the final target. The effect of stack pressure on cell‐to‐module energy density efficiency is also calculated to quantitative analysis. These insights provide practical suggestion from ASSPCs design to module‐level pressure management.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published August 04, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (12)

Y

Yue Gong

Y

Yue Ji

S

Shuangquan Lin

Solid‐State Batteries Research Center GRINM (Guangdong) Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology Foshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Electrochemical Functional Materials and Technology Foshan Guangdong P. R. China

T

Tengjiao Luan

Solid‐State Batteries Research Center GRINM (Guangdong) Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology Foshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Electrochemical Functional Materials and Technology Foshan Guangdong P. R. China

S

Shuaike Wang

Solid‐State Batteries Research Center GRINM (Guangdong) Institute for Advanced Materials and Technology Foshan Key Laboratory of Advanced Electrochemical Functional Materials and Technology Foshan Guangdong P. R. China

Y

Yu Xia

Y

Yingying Jiang

X

Xiaona Li

Eastern Institute for Advanced Study, Ningbo Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of All-Solid-State Battery

J

Jianwen Liang

D

Dawei Wang

Lehn Institute of Functional Materials, GBRCE for Functional Molecular Engineering, IGCME, School of Chemistry

X

Xueliang Sun

C

Changtai Zhao

National Power Battery Innovation Center