Long-term survival outcomes of consolidative local ablative therapy after response to first-line systemic treatment in oligometastatic NSCLC.
Abstract
8601 Background: The role of consolidative local ablative therapy (LAT) for patients (pts) with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have responded to first line (1L) systemic treatment remains controversial especially after negative results from the NRG LU002 phase II/III trial. Data on long-term survival outcomes remain limited. Methods: We retrospectively collected data from EMR records of pts with oligometastatic NSCLC treated with 1L systemic treatment at the University of Pennsylvania Health System (2015–2025). Oligometastasis was defined as ≤4 distant metastases. Eligible pts had either genuine synchronous or induced oligometastatic disease and had achieved partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) after 1L systemic treatment. We hypothesized that LAT would be associated with improved PFS and OS using time-dependent Cox regression analysis. Results: We identified 187 eligible pts. 53% were female; median age was 67 yrs and 31% had PD-L1 expression > 50%. At diagnosis, 90% had genuine oligometastatic disease: 45% with one metastatic lesion, 24% with two, 15% with three, and 11% with four lesions. Median follow- up time was 81 mos. (Reverse Kaplan-Meier). Of 187 pts, 21 received consolidative LAT in addition to maintenance therapy (LAT+) while 166 received maintenance therapy alone (LAT-). The LAT+ group was less likely to have bone metastasis (4.8% vs 34%, P = 0.007) and more likely to have adrenal metastasis (38% vs 19%, P = 0.049). In the LAT+ group, 67% had received chemo-immunotherapy as 1L and 19% had received immunotherapy alone, compared with 58% and 17% in the LAT− group, respectively (P = 0.80, Chi-square). In the LAT+ group, 76% achieved PR and 24% had SD to 1L therapy, compared with 65% and 35% in the LAT− group, respectively (P = 0.30, Chi-square). Median time from diagnosis to LAT delivery was 6 mos. (range, 2 – 24 mos.). The most common LAT modality was radiation (82%). The most common site of LAT was lung (68%). Median PFS was 28 vs 12 mos. and median OS was 98 vs 24 mos. in the LAT+ and LAT− groups, respectively. In time-dependent Cox models treating LAT as time-varying exposure, LAT+ was associated with improved PFS (P = 0.045) and OS (P = 0.003). A multivariable model confirmed the benefit of LAT after adjusting for PD-L1 status, treatment response, brain metastasis, bone metastasis, and nodal status (PFS: HR = 0.38, P = 0.004; OS: HR = 0.27, P = 0.002). Adverse events grade ≥3 were similar in both groups. Conclusions: LAT was associated with significantly improved PFS and OS in pts with oligometastatic NSCLC with an objective response or stable disease following 1L systemic treatment. Prospective studies are warranted to define pt characteristics that predict the greatest benefit from and optimal timing of LAT.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Phurin Areesawangkit
Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Adam Barsouk
2Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Maxim Yaskolko
Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
Lucy Wang
Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education ERC of Membrane and Water Treatment (MOE) College of Chemical and Biological Engineering Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
Cole Friedes
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Roger B. Cohen
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Lova Sun
Penn Medicine Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Charu Aggarwal
Melina Elpi Marmarelis
Penn Medicine Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Aditi Puri Singh
Penn Medicine Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Kyle William Robinson
Penn Medicine Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Christopher D'Avella
Penn Medicine-Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
Christine Agnes Ciunci
Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Steven J. Feigenberg
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
Jeffrey D. Bradley
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
Nikhil Yegya-Raman
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Michelle Iocolano
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Christiana Davis
Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Corey J. Langer
Penn Medicine Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA