Machine learning models combining <sup>68</sup> Ga-PSMA PET radiomics and clinical features to predict overall survival for mCRPC patients treated with <sup>177</sup> Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy.

L Lucas Edouard (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) L Loïc Ferrer (SOPHiA GENETICS, Pessac, France) L Léa Papillon (SOPHiA Genetics, Pessac, France) N Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) M Marie Meyer (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) V Vincent Prega-Renaud (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) Y Yann Godbert (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) N Nadège Anizan (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) M Mathilde Cabart (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) D Diego Teyssonneau (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) G Guilhem Roubaud (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) T Thierry Colin P Paul Schwartz (Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France)

Abstract

215 Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains incurable despite recent therapeutic advances. 177 Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) provides meaningful clinical benefit in selected patients, yet approximately 30% show limited or no response. Although various baseline prognostic factors are well known, reliable pre-therapeutic predictive biomarkers are still lacking. Among emerging solutions, radiomics—by extracting quantitative imaging features—offers a novel approach to capture tumor heterogeneity and predict outcomes beyond standard visual assessment. To address this need, we developed and compared several predictive machine learning models integrating clinical, biochemical, and imaging data—including 68 Ga-PSMA PET radiomic features—to estimate overall survival in mCRPC patients treated with 177 Lu-PSMA RLT. Methods: This retrospective monocentric study included 102 mCRPC patients treated with 177 Lu-PSMA between January 2022 and March 2024. Five lesions per patient were segmented on their pre-therapeutic 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Radiomic features were extracted following IBSI guidelines. Associations with OS were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Multimodal machine learning (ML) models integrating clinical, genomic, biochemical, and imaging features (including radiomics) were developed to predict OS. Results: Median OS of the total cohort was 11.2 months. Intralesional homogeneity characterized by 2nd order radiomic feature “Normalized Inverse Difference Moment” was associated with shorter OS (p=0.025). Among clinical parameters, ECOG ≥2, liver metastases, and high tumor burden (≥20 metastases or superbone scan) were significantly correlated with poor OS (p&lt;0.05). The model leveraging PET data alone achieved strong performance, with a 12-month AUC comparable to the clinical model (0.715 vs 0.766). The best-performing ML model achieved a 12-month AUC of 0.778 by combining 22 clinical, biochemical, genomic, and radiomic features. Conclusions: Machine learning models based on 68 Ga-PSMA PET data, including radiomic features, offer a non-invasive, standardized, and widely accessible approach to predict survival in mCRPC patients treated with 177 Lu-PSMA RLT. Imaging-only models achieved performance comparable to clinical–biochemical models, providing robust prognostic information even in the absence of extensive clinical or molecular data. This highlights the strong predictive potential of PSMA PET imaging for patient stratification in real-world settings. Furthermore, radiomic characterization of intratumoral heterogeneity adds independent prognostic value, supporting the integration of imaging-derived biomarkers into personalized treatment decision-making.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 215-215
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

L

Lucas Edouard

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

L

Loïc Ferrer

SOPHiA GENETICS, Pessac, France

L

Léa Papillon

SOPHiA Genetics, Pessac, France

N

Nicolas Benziane-Ouaritini

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

M

Marie Meyer

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

V

Vincent Prega-Renaud

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

Y

Yann Godbert

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

N

Nadège Anizan

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

M

Mathilde Cabart

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

D

Diego Teyssonneau

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

G

Guilhem Roubaud

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

T

Thierry Colin

P

Paul Schwartz

Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France