Mesenchymal stromal cells for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

M Muhammad Ayyan (Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan) R Roshan Afshan (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) S Sushmitha Rameshbabu (Institute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India) H Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan (Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Chennai, India) M Mudit Moondra (Rabindranath Tagore Medical College, Udaipur, India) S Seema Nabil Nimer (University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan) M Muhammad Faisal Aslam (UAB St. Vincent's East Hospital, Birmingham, AL) S Sean Ghose (University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada) R Raef Nizar Ali (Jordanian Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan) A Anuj Timshina (Department of Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Science, Kathmandu, Nepal) S Shiny Teja Kolli (Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY)

Abstract

e18549 Background: Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential alternative therapeutic strategy for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Methods: This meta-analysis included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 570 patients. The primary outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), the development of acute GVHD (aGVHD), and chronic GVHD (cGVHD). Secondary outcomes included primary disease relapse and adverse events. The statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) with a random-effects model. Results: The meta-analysis showed a significant improvement in overall survival in the MSC group compared to the control group (RR 1.12; 95% CI: 1.02-1.23), with no evidence of heterogeneity (I²=0%). MSC prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of aGVHD (RR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.83, I²=33%) and cGVHD (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87, I²=0%). However, no significant difference was found between the MSC and control groups regarding primary disease relapse (RR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.73-1.38, I²=0%) or the incidence of infections (RR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.57-1.11, I²=0%). In terms of patients with at least one adverse event, no statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (RR 1.10; 95% CI: 0.74-1.63, I²=34%). Conclusions: MSC prophylaxis significantly improves overall survival and reduces the incidence of both aGVHD and cGVHD in HSCT patients, without increasing the risk of relapse, infections, or adverse events, indicating its potential as a safe and effective intervention for GVHD management.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Muhammad Ayyan

Department of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Mayo Hospital Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

R

Roshan Afshan

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

S

Sushmitha Rameshbabu

Institute of Internal Medicine, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India

H

Hariniska Jayaraman Kannan

Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Chennai, India

M

Mudit Moondra

Rabindranath Tagore Medical College, Udaipur, India

S

Seema Nabil Nimer

University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

M

Muhammad Faisal Aslam

UAB St. Vincent's East Hospital, Birmingham, AL

S

Sean Ghose

University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

R

Raef Nizar Ali

Jordanian Ministry of Health, Amman, Jordan

A

Anuj Timshina

Department of Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Science, Kathmandu, Nepal

S

Shiny Teja Kolli

Department of Medicine, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, NY