Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC): Primary results of the EXTEND continuous ADT (cADT) basket plus combined analysis with the updated intermittent ADT (iADT) basket and immune correlatives.
Abstract
140 Background: In the phase II EXTEND iADT omPC basket, MDT+iADT improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs iADT. Here we present the primary results of the EXTEND cADT omPC basket. We further report a pre-specified combined analysis with updated results from the iADT basket and examine the effects of MDT on immunity. Methods: Patients with 1 to 5 omPC metastases were randomized 1:1 to MDT+cADT vs cADT (NCT03599765). MDT consisted of definitive local therapy. cADT consisted of ADT +/- second-generation anti-androgens. The primary endpoint was per-protocol PFS, defined by biochemical criteria (Prostate Cancer Working Group 3), radiologic measures (RECIST v1.1), clinical progression, or death. 87 patients were needed to show superiority at a one-sided P of 0.10 by log-rank test. CDR3 regions in rearranged T cell receptor (TCR) β-chains from pre- and post-enrollment peripheral blood were sequenced with immunoSEQ (Adaptive Biotech). TCR repertoire modulation was defined as having TCR expansion plus contraction using a false-discovery-corrected betabinomial model. TCR sequencing from the ORIOLE trial (NCT02680587) was assessed for external validation. Results: From 2018 to 2022, 87 randomized patients were treated per protocol (MDT+cADT: 45; cADT: 42). 39% had castrate resistant omPC. MDT was definitive radiotherapy in all cases. With median follow-up of 31 mo, median PFS was 47 mo after MDT+cADT vs 22 mo after cADT (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.08; one-sided P = 0.036). In the combined analysis (N=174) with median follow-up of 42 mo, MDT+ADT improved PFS (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.69; P < 0.001), radiologic PFS (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.97; P = 0.038), and castration-resistance free-survival (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.82; P = 0.013). MDT+ADT had higher odds of TCR repertoire modulation vs ADT (55% vs 15%, P < 0.001). This finding was validated in the ORIOLE trial (MDT: 57% vs observation: 19%, P = 0.03). Among the subset of patients with extreme responses, random forest modeling of 37 clinical/immune variables identified TCR repertoire modulation as the variable with highest importance; further, MDT+ADT induced TCR repertoire modulation in all patients with favorable responses (i.e. PFS > 4 years) and none with unfavorable responses (i.e. PFS < 1 year). Among all patients randomized to MDT+ADT, TCR repertoire modulation was associated with longer PFS (HR 0.21; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.76; P = 0.02). Conclusions: MDT+cADT met the PFS primary endpoint of the phase II EXTEND trial, warranting phase III testing. From the combined analysis, MDT+ADT may also improve longer term outcomes including radiologic PFS and castration-resistance-free survival. Improved outcomes may result from MDT-induced immunomodulation, with implications for future trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT03599765 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Alexander Dean Sherry
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Cara L Haymaker
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Bryan M. Fellman
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Tharakeswara K. Bathala
Marina N. Medina-Rosales
Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Suyu Liu
3Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Stephen G. Chun
Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Lauren L. Mayo
Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Seungtaek Choi
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Ryan Phillips
Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
Matthew Pierre Deek
Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Ana Aparicio
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Amado J. Zurita
Patrick Glen Pilié
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Bilal Ahmed Siddiqui
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Sumit Kumar Subudhi
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Alexandre Reuben
Paul Gettys Corn
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Phuoc T. Tran
Chad Tang
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA