Minimal residual disease ctDNA testing in metastatic breast cancer patients with no radiological evidence of disease: Potentialclinical utility from real-worlddata.

C Caterina Gianni (Milena Urbini, PhD, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Thomas F. Eleveld, PhD, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Maurizio Polano, PhD, Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Aviano, Italy; Emanuela Scarpi, PhD, Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Cecilia Menna, MD, and Caterina Gianni, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Ferdinand W. Janssen, MSc, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Giuseppe Schepisi, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Giorgia Gurioli, PhD, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei ...) I Irene Azzali O Olivia Rieur (Division of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School) A Arielle J. Medford N Nitin Katakam (Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO) A Andrew A. Davis E Emily L. Podany (Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO) A Alexis Ann LeVee (Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) L Letizia Pontolillo (Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy) M Marla Lipsyc-Sharf (University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) B Brenno Pastò (CRO Aviano, Aviano, Italy) L Lorenzo Foffano (Universita degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy) H Hunter Gaudio (The Children's Hospital of Phil., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States) E Eleonora Nicolo' (Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan, Milano, Italy) C Carolina Reduzzi L Lorenzo Gerratana A Antonino Musolino (IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy) A Aditya Bardia M Massimo Cristofanilli (Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York)

Abstract

e13075 Background: Liquid biopsy is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool for disease monitoring in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with growing evidence supporting its role in treatment response assessment and minimal residual disease (MRD) detection across disease settings. This multi-institutional retrospective analysis evaluated the real-world use of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)–based MRD testing in patients(pts) with MBC who achieved radiological no evidence of disease (NED). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pts with MBC treated at four institutions within the Precision Medicine Action for Cancer (PMAC) consortium who achieved radiological and/or metabolic complete response (CR) PET or CT imaging at any point during their MBC course. ctDNA-based MRD assessment was performed as part of routine clinical practice between September 2022 and December 2025 using plasma-only (Guardant Reveal, Guardant Health) or tissue-informed (Signatera) assays. Data were collected through retrospective review of electronic medical records under appropriate IRB approval. Analyses were descriptive. Results: 43 pts with MBC who achieved radiological NED and underwent MRD testing were identified, accounting for 225 ctDNA tests (median 5 tests per patient; IQR 1–8). Molecular subtypes included 36% luminal disease,24% triple-negative, and 40% HER2-positive disease. Median follow-up (fup) from primary breast cancer diagnosis was 63.2 months (IQR, 34.1–109.4). Longitudinal testing (≥2 ctDNA tests) was performed in 22 patients (51%). At first MRD assessment, 35 pts (81.4%) were MRD-negative: 27 had already achieved radiological CR, while in 8 patients MRD negativity preceded radiological NED by a median of 2.7 months (range 0.4-13.4). 5 pts had a positive MRD result at first evaluation concordant with radiological evidence of disease, and 3 had a positive first MRD test despite the absence of detectable disease. Among pts with at least one post-response MRD assessment, 26 pts (70.3%) showed persistently negative MRD results during longitudinal monitoring; among them, imaging was deferred in 7 cases and treatment de-escalation was pursued in 13 cases after at least one negative MRD test. Overall, 14 pts (32.6%) had at least one MRD-positive result during response fup; in six cases, longitudinal ctDNA monitoring anticipated radiological disease progression by a median of 1.05 months (range 0.5-3.7). At last fup, 20 pts remained radiologically disease-free with persistently negative ctDNA while in CR (median fup from first negative ctDNA test of 15.3 months). Conclusions: ctDNA MRD negativity was largely concordant with radiological or metabolic CR. This real-world cohort supports further prospective investigation to inform clinical management in patients with MBC achieving radiological NED.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

C

Caterina Gianni

Milena Urbini, PhD, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Thomas F. Eleveld, PhD, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Maurizio Polano, PhD, Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Unit, IRCCS Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), Aviano, Italy; Emanuela Scarpi, PhD, Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Cecilia Menna, MD, and Caterina Gianni, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Ferdinand W. Janssen, MSc, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Giuseppe Schepisi, MD, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy; Giorgia Gurioli, PhD, Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei ...

I

Irene Azzali

O

Olivia Rieur

Division of Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

A

Arielle J. Medford

N

Nitin Katakam

Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

A

Andrew A. Davis

E

Emily L. Podany

Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO

A

Alexis Ann LeVee

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

L

Letizia Pontolillo

Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

M

Marla Lipsyc-Sharf

University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

B

Brenno Pastò

CRO Aviano, Aviano, Italy

L

Lorenzo Foffano

Universita degli Studi di Udine, Udine, Italy

H

Hunter Gaudio

The Children's Hospital of Phil., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

E

Eleonora Nicolo'

Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, University of Milan, Milano, Italy

C

Carolina Reduzzi

L

Lorenzo Gerratana

A

Antonino Musolino

IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy

A

Aditya Bardia

M

Massimo Cristofanilli

Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York