Molecular residual disease detection for ovarian cancer using a WGS-based ctDNA assay: Initial findings from the MONSTAR-SCREEN-3.

F Fuminori Ito (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) H Hiroshi Tanabe H Haruya Saji (Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan) Y Yukio Suzuki (Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan) M Mika Sakai (Research Center of Materials Science (RCMS) Nagoya University Furo, Chikusa Nagoya 464‐8602 Japan) T Tatsuyuki Chiyoda H Hiroyuki Kurosu (Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan) A Akiko Furusawa (Shizuoka Cancer Center, Mishima, Japan) M Michiko Nagamine (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) K Kenichi Harano (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) T Tadayoshi Hashimoto (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) T Takao Fujisawa H Hideaki Bando T Takeshi Kuwata (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) E Eiji Oki J Jeff Jasper (Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) G Greg J. Hogan (Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) D Dale Muzzey (Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) T Takayuki Yoshino (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) H Hidemichi Watari

Abstract

202 Background: Ovarian cancer, including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinoma, is often diagnosed at advanced stages. Although cytoreductive surgery and perioperative chemotherapy is a fundamental strategy, treatment outcomes remain unfavorable. Molecular residual disease (MRD) assessed by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a novel prognostic factor in multiple cancer types. However, ctDNA data in ovarian cancer remain limited, particularly using whole-genome sequencing (WGS)–based approaches. Methods: MONSTAR-SCREEN-3 is a prospective, multicenter study involving 1,100 patients (pts) with solid tumors, including ovarian cancer, undergoing curative treatment. Personalized panels (Precise MRD, Myriad Genetics) incorporating up to 1,000 targeted variants identified by WGS of matched tumor tissue were constructed. Plasma samples were collected sequentially at baseline, after preoperative chemotherapy, and at 1 month (M) post-surgery, every 3M during year 1, and every 6M during year 2. Results: As of December 2025, 65 pts with ovarian cancer were enrolled. Of whom, 40 ovarian cancer pts with both ctDNA results and clinical data available were included. 72.5% (29/40) were in FIGO stage III/IV, and 30 pts underwent upfront surgery and 10 pts received preoperative chemotherapy. Serous carcinoma was the most common histological type (50%). Thirty-five pts received curative-intent surgery, the majority of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy. Personalized panel creation was successful for all pts, with 82.5% achieving the maximum 1,000-variant panel. Among a total of 112 plasma samples passed quality control, 87 (77.7%) showed ctDNA positivity, with 26.4% (23/87) detected at an ultra-sensitive level (tumor fraction [TF] < 100 parts per million [ppm]). ctDNA positivity at baseline (100% detected at TF over 100 ppm), 1M, and 3M post-surgery, were 100%, 76.7%, and 62.5%, respectively. Among post-operative samples, ultrasensitive-level detection was observed in 34.8% at 1M and 60% (9/15) at 3M, with a minimum TF of 2.4 ppm. Even in cases with macroscopic complete resection, only 27.8% (5/18) were MRD-negative. With a median follow-up of 3.7 months (0-13.3 months), three pts relapsed with a median lead time of 2.9 months (range, 0-6 months). Extended follow-up and longitudinal ctDNA data will be presented. Conclusions: In advanced ovarian cancer undergoing curative treatment, we reported the dynamics of ctDNA using a WGS-based ctDNA detection assay. Ovarian cancer demonstrated a high ctDNA-shedding phenotype; nevertheless, a clinically relevant subset of post-operative samples was detectable at ultrasensitive levels, underscoring the necessity of high-sensitivity assays. Further follow-up is warranted to establish the clinical significance of ultra-sensitive MRD detection in ovarian cancer. Clinical trial information: UMIN000053975 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 19_suppl
Published July 01, 2026
Pages 202-202
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

F

Fuminori Ito

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

H

Hiroshi Tanabe

H

Haruya Saji

Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan

Y

Yukio Suzuki

Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan

M

Mika Sakai

Research Center of Materials Science (RCMS) Nagoya University Furo, Chikusa Nagoya 464‐8602 Japan

T

Tatsuyuki Chiyoda

H

Hiroyuki Kurosu

Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan

A

Akiko Furusawa

Shizuoka Cancer Center, Mishima, Japan

M

Michiko Nagamine

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

K

Kenichi Harano

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

T

Tadayoshi Hashimoto

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

T

Takao Fujisawa

H

Hideaki Bando

T

Takeshi Kuwata

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

E

Eiji Oki

J

Jeff Jasper

Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT

G

Greg J. Hogan

Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT

D

Dale Muzzey

Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT

T

Takayuki Yoshino

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

H

Hidemichi Watari