Nanomaterials Drive In Vivo CAR Immune Cells Engineering

M Meifen Luo (Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China) K Kai Liao J Jinxi Chang (The First Clinical College Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China) J Junze Xie (Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China) X Xing‐Jie Liang (Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China) Q Qi Lei (The Second Affiliated Hospital, Provincial Key Laboratory of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Medical University) W Weisheng Guo (Translational Medicine Center, Key Laboratory of Molecular Target and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immune cell therapy has emerged as a cornerstone of modern cell‐based medicine, demonstrating potent clinical efficacy against a range of malignant tumors and autoimmune diseases. Nevertheless, conventional ex vivo CAR immune cell manufacturing is hindered by complexity, high costs, and significant inter‐individual variability, which have limited its broad clinical application. These bottlenecks have prompted a paradigm shift toward in vivo CAR engineering, wherein nanocarriers directly deliver genetic material to circulating or tissue‐resident immune cells, substantially simplifying the production process. This review first outlines the evolution of CAR immune cell therapy and key limitations of ex vivo approaches and then examines major delivery platforms for in vivo approaches. Comparative analyses are presented across delivery efficiency, cellular tropism, and expression kinetics, with particular emphasis on delineating the mechanistic distinctions and application boundaries between transient and durable expression strategies. We further dissect the critical challenges, including receptor‐mediated non‐specific immune activation, nanocarrier‐associated immunogenicity constraining repeated administration, and delivery barriers imposed by the solid tumor microenvironment. Finally, the intrinsic trade‐off between therapeutic durability and biosafety across distinct delivery platforms is discussed, along with the necessity that their clinical translation hinges on systematic optimization of delivery precision, immune compatibility, and expression controllability.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 38, Issue 46
Published August 01, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (7)

M

Meifen Luo

Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China

K

Kai Liao

J

Jinxi Chang

The First Clinical College Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China

J

Junze Xie

Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China

X

Xing‐Jie Liang

Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Radiology School of Biomedical Engineering & The Second Affiliated Hospital Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou P. R. China

Q

Qi Lei

The Second Affiliated Hospital, Provincial Key Laboratory of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Guangzhou Medical University

W

Weisheng Guo

Translational Medicine Center, Key Laboratory of Molecular Target and Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences and The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University