Nectin-4 targeted ADC, SHR-A2102, in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A phase 1 study.

B Bixia Tang X Xinan Sheng (Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing) J Jun Guo H Haitao Niu (Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China) Y Yali Shen (Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China) S Shusuan Jiang (Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China) B Bin Fu (State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics) J Jianming Guo W Wasilijiang Wahafu (Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China) K Kai Yao (School of Materials Science and Engineering) N Nan Liu J Jiang Gu (Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China) Y Yu Chen Z Zhenhua Li (State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences) T Tianxin Lin L Liping Ma J Jiaqin Lin (Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) C Chi Zhang W Wenliang Wang

Abstract

657 Background: SHR-A2102 is a novel ADC that consists of a fully humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting nectin-4, a cleavable linker, and a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload with high membrane permeability and potent cell-killing efficacy. We have initiated a first-in-human phase 1 study to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of SHR-A2102 in advanced solid tumors. Here, we present preliminary findings, focusing on urothelial carcinoma. Methods: Patients (pts) with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who had failed or were intolerant to standard therapies, were eligible. SHR-A2102 was given intravenously at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 mg/kg on D1 Q3W and 4 mg/kg on D1 and D8 Q3W during dose escalation. 6 and 8 mg/kg were selected for dose and efficacy expansions. Results: As of Aug 2, 2024, 73 UC pts were enrolled (median age: 65 yrs; ≥2 lines of prior systemic therapies: 57.5%; prior ADC: 42.5%). Efficacy outcomes were summarized in Table. Confirmed ORR was 38.4% (28/73; 95% CI, 27.2–50.5) in all pts, and was 32.3% (10/31; 95% CI, 16.7–51.4) in the 6 mg/kg dose group and 50.0% (16/32; 95% CI, 31.9–68.1) in the 8 mg/kg dose group. 6-mo DoR rate was 59.3% (95% CI, 23.1–83.0) in all pts, and was 66.7% (95% CI, 5.4–94.5) and 54.0% (95% CI, 12.7–83.2) in the 6 and 8 mg/kg groups, respectively. Of note, 31 pts had received ADC prior to study treatment; among them, 12 (38.7%; 95% CI, 21.9–57.8) pts achieved confirmed PR. Overall, TRAEs of grade 3 or worse occurred in 32 (43.8%) pts, with the most common (≥10%) being anemia (23.3%), decreased WBC count (19.2%), and decreased neutrophil count (17.8%). Conclusions: SHR-A2102 showed promising anti-tumor activity in pts with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, even after ADC therapy, along with manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT05735275 . Efficacy summary. All UC pts(N=73) 6 mg/kg(N=31) 8 mg/kg (N=32) ADC pretreated pts (N=31) Best overall response, n (%) Confirmed PR 28 (38.4) 10 (32.3) 16 (50.0) 12 (38.7) SD 30 (41.1) 18 (58.1) 10 (31.3) 11 (35.5) PD 12 (16.4) 3 (9.7) 3 (9.4) 7 (22.6) NE 3 (4.1) 0 3 (9.4) 1 (3.2) Confirmed ORR, % (95% CI) 38.4 (27.2–50.5) 32.3 (16.7–51.4) 50.0 (31.9–68.1) 38.7 (21.9–57.8) DCR, % (95% CI) 79.5 (68.4–88.0) 90.3 (74.3–98.0) 81.3 (63.6–92.8) 74.2 (55.4–88.1) 6-mo DoR rate, % (95% CI) 59.3 (23.1–83.0) 66.7 (5.4–94.5) 54.0 (12.7–83.2) 60.0 (12. 6–88.2) 6-mo PFS rate, % (95% CI) 41.4 (23.6–58.4) 54.7 (24.0–77.4) 38.0 (13.4–62.7) 39.1 (16.6–61.3)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 657-657
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

B

Bixia Tang

X

Xinan Sheng

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing

J

Jun Guo

H

Haitao Niu

Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China

Y

Yali Shen

Division of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

S

Shusuan Jiang

Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China

B

Bin Fu

State Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics

J

Jianming Guo

W

Wasilijiang Wahafu

Department of Urology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

K

Kai Yao

School of Materials Science and Engineering

N

Nan Liu

J

Jiang Gu

Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China

Y

Yu Chen

Z

Zhenhua Li

State Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Photobiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences

T

Tianxin Lin

L

Liping Ma

J

Jiaqin Lin

Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China

C

Chi Zhang

W

Wenliang Wang