Neoadjuvant botensilimab (BOT) plus balstilimab (BAL) in resectable mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) and deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC): NEST clinical trial update.

E Erika Hissong (NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY) M Mehraneh D. Jafari (NewYork-Presbyterian and Cornell, New York, NY) S Sahrish Khan (Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY) P Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi P Preethi Guniganti (Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY) A Allyson J. Ocean (NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY) D Despina Siolas (NewYork Presbyterian and Cornell, New York, NY) H Heather Yeo (NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY) U Uqba Khan (NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY) A Alessio Pigazzi (City of Hope, Irvine, CA) A Areeb Lutfi (NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY) Z Zhengming Chen M Manish A. Shah (Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY) M Manuel Hidalgo

Abstract

207 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have been transformative for localized dMMR CRC (microsatellite instability-high [MSI-H]), but not for localized pMMR CRC (microsatellite stable [MSS]). The combination of BOT, a novel Fc-enhanced multifunctional CTLA-4 antibody, and BAL, an anti-PD-1 antibody, has demonstrated significant activity in metastatic CRC. We examined this novel dual CPI therapy in patients with MSI-H and MSS localized CRC. Methods: This is a single arm trial of neoadjuvant BOT 75 mg/m 2 (day 1) and BAL 240 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks x2 (NEST1) or x4 (NEST2) in patients with localized CRC who were candidates for surgery. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR), defined as ≥90% pathologic tumor regression. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed based on exact method for binomial distribution. Results: NEST1 (n=12: 9 MSS / 3 MSI-H) accrued from 3/21/23 to 9/25/23 and NEST2 (n=14: 13 MSS / 1 MSI-H; 2 MSS patients had synchronous CRC) accrued from 2/15/24 to 5/6/24; 2 patients in NEST1 were not evaluable (1 with rectal cancer not resected [ypT0N0 on local excision] and 1 patient with occult lung metastasis). In total, 7 MSS CRC tumors were evaluable from NEST1 and 15 from NEST2; and 3 MSI-H tumors were evaluable from NEST1 and 1 from NEST2, leaving a final evaluable study population of 24 patients (20 MSS / 4 MSI-H) and 26 tumors (22 MSS / 4 MSI-H). The Table provides pathologic response rates across NEST1, NEST2, and MSI-H. With a median follow-up of 13.1 months (NEST1) and 4.8 months (NEST2), no patients have recurred and ctDNA testing remains negative. No grade 4 toxicities were observed and the only treatment-related grade 3 toxicity was diarrhea/colitis in 15% and fever in 4%. Treatment-related grade 2 diarrhea/colitis occurred in 8%, grade 2 fever in 15%, and grade 2 fatigue in 4% of patients. Diarrhea/colitis resolved in all cases with steroids ± anti-TNFα therapy. All patients underwent laparoscopic resection, with 1 conversion to open. No surgeries were delayed due to treatment-related adverse events. Median length of stay was 2 days (range 1-14). Translational data including pathologic evaluation of tumor infiltrate and response will be presented. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant BOT/BAL is safe, with no delays to surgery, and effective. We observed high MPR rates in both MSS and MSI-H CRC with no recurrences to date. The MPR and pCR rate improved with extended time to surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT05571293 . Pathologic response to neoadjuvant BOT/BAL in localized CRC. Pathologic Response NEST 1n=7 MSS tumors NEST 2n=15 MSS tumors MSI-H (3 NEST1, 1 NEST2) 100% (CR%, 95%CI) 1 (14%, 0.4-58%) 6* (40%, 16-68%) 3** (75%, 19-99%) ≥ 90% (MPR%, 95%CI) 2 (29%, 4-71%) 7 (47%, 21-73%) 4^ (100%, 40-100%) ≥ 50% 4 (57%) 9 (60%) 4 (100%) Median days to Surgery (range) 29 (21-37) 57 (45-104) 46 (34-78) *2 with carcinoma in situ , no tumor bed. ^MPR was in NEST1. **1 was rectal.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 207-207
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

E

Erika Hissong

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY

M

Mehraneh D. Jafari

NewYork-Presbyterian and Cornell, New York, NY

S

Sahrish Khan

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

P

Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi

P

Preethi Guniganti

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

A

Allyson J. Ocean

NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY

D

Despina Siolas

NewYork Presbyterian and Cornell, New York, NY

H

Heather Yeo

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

U

Uqba Khan

NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

A

Alessio Pigazzi

City of Hope, Irvine, CA

A

Areeb Lutfi

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Z

Zhengming Chen

M

Manish A. Shah

Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

M

Manuel Hidalgo