Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 therapy for patients with large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer: Final outcomes of a multicenter, phase II study (OGSG1902).
Abstract
366 Background: Large type 3 (≥8 cm) and type 4 gastric cancers are associated with extremely poor prognoses. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been proposed as a potential strategy to improve outcomes in these patients. The phase III JCOG0501 trial, which compared neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy with upfront surgery, failed to demonstrate a survival benefit for the neoadjuvant approach. Based on the results of the PRODIGY study, DOS therapy was considered a potential candidate for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer without distant metastases, except for positive peritoneal cytology (CY), were eligible. Staging laparoscopy was mandatory. Participants received three cycles of neoadjuvant DOS therapy (docetaxel 40 mg/m² and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² intravenously on day 1, and oral S-1 at 80 mg/m² for 14 days, repeated every 3 weeks), followed by gastrectomy with ≥D2 lymphadenectomy. Patients who achieved R0 resection subsequently received adjuvant docetaxel plus S-1 therapy for one year. The primary endpoint was the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, with an expected value of 60% and a threshold of 45%. A one-sided log-rank test was used with α=0.10 and power (1−β) =0.8. Results: Between October 2019 and February 2022, 48 patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range: 44–79), and 29 patients (60.4%) were male. Twenty-seven patients (56.2%) had type 4 tumors. Positive CY was observed in 10 patients (20.8%). Clinical stage III and IV disease were observed in 24 (50.0%) and 11 (22.9%) patients, respectively. NAC was completed in 91.7% of patients. The 3-year PFS rate was 37.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.1–50.6%, 80% CI: 28.6–46.4%, p = 0.96), and the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 52.1% (95% CI: 37.2–65.0%). Among 10 patients with measurable lesions, the objective response rate was 50.0%. The R0 resection rate was 89.6%. A pathological response of grade 1b or higher was achieved in 66.7% of patients. CY conversion to negative was achieved in 80.0% of cases. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events during NAC, including neutropenia and appetite loss, occurred in 37.5% of patients. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a favorable pathological response and acceptable safety profile of neoadjuvant DOS therapy for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. However, the 3-year PFS did not exceed the null hypothesis threshold, and the survival benefit of DOS therapy could not be demonstrated. Clinical trial information: CRB5180012 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Takeshi Omori
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
Shunji Endo
Department of Digestive Surgery, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Kurashiki, Japan
Toshifumi Yamaguchi
Hiromichi Miyagaki
Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Ryo Tanaka
Naoki Takahashi
Toru Masuzawa
Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
Haruna Furukawa
Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Osaka, Japan
Yuya Sato
Research Institute of Electrical Communication
Atsushi Takeno
Department of Surgery, NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Naoki Shinno
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
Junji Kawada
Ryohei Kawabata
Shinsuke Katsuyama
Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
Shigeyoshi Higashi
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano, Japan
Yukinori Kurokawa
Toshimasa Tsujinaka
Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Japan
Toshio Shimokawa
Clinical Research Support Center, Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Japan (T.S.).
Taroh Satoh