Nezastomig (anti-PSMA×CD28) with or without cemiplimab (anti–PD-1) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC): A phase 1/2 study.
Abstract
TPS296 Background: Advanced mCRPC and mccRCC are urologic malignancies associated with poor prognoses, presenting an unmet need for novel therapies that can improve long-term outcomes for patients. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane protein with enzymatic activity and is highly expressed by prostate cancer cells and mccRCC neovasculature. PSMA has been validated as a therapeutic target for prostate cancer. Nezastomig (REGN5678) is a first-in-class, PSMA×CD28 co-stimulatory bispecific antibody (bsAb) that facilitates T-cell–mediated tumor killing by bridging PSMA-expressing cells with the costimulatory receptor CD28 expressed on T cells. Cemiplimab is an anti–programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody that targets inhibitory T-cell immune checkpoints. Preliminary results from the dose escalation phase of this study (NCT03972657) showed that nezastomig + cemiplimab reduced prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and induced radiographic responses; this provided the first evidence of clinical activity with a PSMA×CD28 co-stimulatory bsAb in solid tumors. Additionally, there was suggested correlation between clinical activity and high-grade immune-mediated adverse reactions in patients with mCRPC. The study has now been amended to reintroduce patient cohorts that will receive nezastomig + cemiplimab combination therapy following a benefit–risk evaluation. Methods: During the dose escalation phase of this open-label, Phase 1/2, first-in-human, multicenter study, nezastomig will be administered at increasing dose levels in combination with cemiplimab in separate cohorts for patients with mCRPC or mccRCC. When a maximum tolerated dose/presumptive recommended Phase 2 dose is identified, additional expansion cohorts may be evaluated. Patients with mCRPC must have received ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy approved for metastatic or castration-resistant disease, including a second-generation androgen-receptor signaling inhibitor and a lutetium-based PSMA-targeted radioligand. Patients with mccRCC must have received ≥1 prior line of systemic therapy approved in the metastatic setting, including anti–PD-1/anti–PD-ligand 1 therapy and either ipilimumab or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Dose escalation primary endpoints are safety, tolerability, and nezastomig pharmacokinetics. The dose expansion primary endpoint is a composite response rate of PSA and radiographic responses per modified Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria (mCRPC cohorts) and objective response rate per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (mccRCC cohorts). This study is open and currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03972657 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Bilal Ahmed Siddiqui
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Mark N. Stein
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Jingsong Zhang
Gerald Steven Falchook
Sarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Denver, CO
Przemyslaw Twardowski
Department of Urology and Oncology, Providence Saint John’s Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA
Xin Gao
Joseph W. Kim
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Edward Paul Gelmann
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ
Benedito A. Carneiro
Legorreta Cancer Center at Brown University, Providence, RI
David R. Wise
Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York, NY
Benjamin Gartrell
Department of Oncology, Montefiore Einstein Comprehensive Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
I. Alex Bowman
Genitourinary Oncology Program, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
Robert Dreicer
University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
Shilpa Govindraj
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Pradeep Thanigaimani
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Fang Fang
Frank A. Seebach
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Michael David Kinnaman
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Sabina Sandigursky
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Elizabeth Miller
3The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States