Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment selection in an emerging treatment era: A patient preference study.
Abstract
754 Background: Patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who become unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) face preference-sensitive choices between emerging and established bladder-sparing treatments or radical cystectomy (RC). This study elicited 1) the preferences of patients in the United States for bladder-sparing treatments with different benefits and burdens and 2) their choice between these options and RC. Methods: Patients with self-reported NMIBC and BCG experience completed an online survey. A discrete-choice experiment (DCE) elicited preferences for hypothetical bladder-sparing treatments. Evidence-based treatment attributes (and levels) included chance of recurrence of NMIBC (45%-69%) and chance of progression to MIBC 1 year after treatment (2%-30%); administration burden (intravesical every week depending on response or every 3 months for 1 year, or intravenous every 6 weeks for up to 2 years); treatment-related fatigue (none to moderate-severe); chance of discomfort and pain or urinary tract infection (0%-30%); and chance of developing immune-related adverse events (AEs) (0%-25%). Conditional relative importance of attributes and risk tolerance measures were calculated from random parameter logit models. In addition to the DCE, direct-elicitation questions offered choices between fixed profiles of different bladder-sparing treatments and RC. The Shared Decision Making (SDM) Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) revealed patients’ levels of satisfaction with previous real-world choices. Responses to the fixed-profile questions and SDM-Q-9 were analyzed descriptively. Results: Among the 206 respondents, reduced risks of progression and disease recurrence were the most important attributes given the range of levels included in the DCE. The other attributes—treatment-related AEs and administration burden—were less important and had statistically similar impacts on choices. On average, patients were willing to accept a >25% risk of immune-related side effects requiring oral steroids to achieve the greatest reductions in disease progression and recurrence offered in the survey. With the exception of repeated BCG-like therapy, most patients (>70%) preferred bladder-sparing treatments over RC. Over 25% of respondents disagreed with the statement “My doctor asked me which treatment option I prefer” when reflecting on their SDM experiences. Conclusions: Patients with NMIBC cared most about treatment efficacy and were generally willing to accept clinically relevant levels of treatment-related risks and discomfort to achieve reductions in disease progression and recurrence. Patients demonstrate heterogeneous preferences, and continued efforts to incorporate shared decision-making into treatment decisions are warranted.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Angela Smith
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
John L. Gore
Department of Urology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Stephanie Chisolm
Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD
Patrick Squires
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ
Haojie Li
Hema Kishore Dave
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ
Caroline Vass
RTI Health Solutions, Manchester, United Kingdom
Xiaoying Liu
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Carol Mansfield
RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC