Novel dynamic circulating biomarkers for predicting therapeutic efficacy of PRaG regimen in advanced refractory solid tumors.

Y Yuehong Kong (Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China) S Shicheng Li (Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering) R Rongzheng Chen (Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China) M Meiling Xu (Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials Design and Application, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering) J Junjun Zhang L Liyuan Zhang (State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Advanced Pharmaceuticals and Biomaterials)

Abstract

2548 Background: Common biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, face notable challenges with tumor tissue sampling and the inability to enable dynamic monitoring. Circulating T lymphocyte subset classification and cytokines offers a promising alternative, reflecting T cell functionality and predicting ICI responses. The PRaG regimen, combining PD-1 inhibitors, radiotherapy, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic or refractory solid tumors unresponsive to standard therapies. This study seeks to develop an efficacy evaluation model by intergrating dynamic peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets and cytokines, based on comprehensive analysis of clinical data from the PRaG studies. Methods: Data from the PRaG 1.0 (ChiCTR1900026175), PRaG 2.0 (NCT04892498), and PRaG 3.0 (NCT05115500) studies were analyzed to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. Machine learning models, including linear, sequential, attention-based, and hybrid models, were employed to predict disease progression. These models utilized dynamic peripheral blood data from thirty-five lymphocyte subsets and seven cytokines, collected across treatment cycles. Model efficacy was further validated using independent data from two additional PRaG studies (NCT05790447 and NCT06112041). Results: As of November 30, 2023, 132 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 63 years. Patients over 65 accounted for 41.7%, and 60.4% had more than five metastatic sites. Patients with an ECOG score of 2-3 made up 59.7% of the cohort. The ORR was 20.13%, and the disease control rate was 48.19%. Dynamic monitoring of peripheral blood features across treatment cycles facilitated the development of an LSTM-HeterGNN model, which integrates long short-term memory (LSTM) networks with heterogeneous graph neural networks (heterGNN). This model outperformed ten other models, achieving a ROC AUC of 0.818. Independent validation further demonstrated robust performance, with a ROC AUC of 0.801. Conclusions: This study underscores the potential of the PRaG regimen as an effective salvage therapy for advanced solid tumors after the failure of standard treatments. The LSTM-HeterGNN model, leveraging dynamic peripheral blood biomarkers, provided precise efficacy predictions, surpassing traditional models. These findings lay the groundwork for dynamic treatment monitoring and optimization. Larger sample sizes are required to further validate the model’s generalizability.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 2548-2548
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (6)

Y

Yuehong Kong

Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

S

Shicheng Li

Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering

R

Rongzheng Chen

Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

M

Meiling Xu

Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials Design and Application, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering

J

Junjun Zhang

L

Liyuan Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Natural Medicines and Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Drug Discovery for Metabolic Diseases, Center of Advanced Pharmaceuticals and Biomaterials