Novel Systemic Anticancer Treatments and Health Services Use at the End of Life Among Adults With Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE Use of chemotherapy at the end of life (EOL) is discouraged, but evidence to guide decisions on the use of novel systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) agents is lacking. We examined trends of use among SACT types and association with health services use at the EOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed Canadian Ontario Cancer Registry data for adults diagnosed with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies within 5 years of death who received SACT between March 2015 and March 2021. Receipt of SACT in the last 30 days of life was categorized as chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone, and targeted therapy alone. Outcomes included high health services use, including multiple (≥2) emergency department (ED) visits, multiple (≥2) hospitalizations, or any (≥1) intensive care unit admission, and hospital deaths. Segmented linear regression estimated monthly trends; multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of outcomes for various SACT types. RESULTS Among 68,963 patients, 18,337 (26.6%) received SACT at the EOL. From March 2015 to March 2020, use of SACT at the EOL increased (0.072% per month; P < .001), mainly driven by increased use of immunotherapy alone (0.064% per month; P < .001). Adjusted odds of high health services use and hospital death were more than two-fold greater among patients receiving SACT at the EOL (vs. none); individual aORs of high health services use and hospital death were 2.20 and 2.72 for chemotherapy alone, 2.36 and 3.10 for chemotherapy and immunotherapy, 1.92 and 2.27 for immunotherapy alone, and 1.75 and 2.37 for targeted therapy alone, respectively. CONCLUSION Use of SACT at the EOL increased significantly over time, driven by increased use of immunotherapy. SACT use at the EOL, regardless of its type, was associated with high health services use and hospital death. Guidelines on the use of SACT at the EOL should include novel cancer treatments.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (18)
Javaid Iqbal
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Rahim Moineddin
Kieran L. Quinn
Christopher M. Booth
Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
Craig C. Earle
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Stephanie Lheureux
Robert Grant
Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Jenny Lau
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Lisa W. Le
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
Peter Tanuseputro
James Downar
Gary Rodin
Hsien Seow
1McMaster University, Oncology, Hamilton, Canada
Jillian Tsai
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Robert A. Fowler
Breffni Hannon
Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Monika K. Krzyzanowska
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Camilla Zimmermann