Novel Systemic Anticancer Treatments and Health Services Use at the End of Life Among Adults With Cancer

J Javaid Iqbal (Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom) R Rahim Moineddin K Kieran L. Quinn C Christopher M. Booth (Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada) C Craig C. Earle (Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada) S Stephanie Lheureux R Robert Grant (Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada) J Jenny Lau (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada) L Lisa W. Le (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada) P Peter Tanuseputro J James Downar G Gary Rodin H Hsien Seow (1McMaster University, Oncology, Hamilton, Canada) J Jillian Tsai (Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada) R Robert A. Fowler B Breffni Hannon (Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada) M Monika K. Krzyzanowska (Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada) C Camilla Zimmermann

Abstract

PURPOSE Use of chemotherapy at the end of life (EOL) is discouraged, but evidence to guide decisions on the use of novel systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) agents is lacking. We examined trends of use among SACT types and association with health services use at the EOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed Canadian Ontario Cancer Registry data for adults diagnosed with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies within 5 years of death who received SACT between March 2015 and March 2021. Receipt of SACT in the last 30 days of life was categorized as chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, immunotherapy alone, and targeted therapy alone. Outcomes included high health services use, including multiple (≥2) emergency department (ED) visits, multiple (≥2) hospitalizations, or any (≥1) intensive care unit admission, and hospital deaths. Segmented linear regression estimated monthly trends; multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of outcomes for various SACT types. RESULTS Among 68,963 patients, 18,337 (26.6%) received SACT at the EOL. From March 2015 to March 2020, use of SACT at the EOL increased (0.072% per month; P < .001), mainly driven by increased use of immunotherapy alone (0.064% per month; P < .001). Adjusted odds of high health services use and hospital death were more than two-fold greater among patients receiving SACT at the EOL (vs. none); individual aORs of high health services use and hospital death were 2.20 and 2.72 for chemotherapy alone, 2.36 and 3.10 for chemotherapy and immunotherapy, 1.92 and 2.27 for immunotherapy alone, and 1.75 and 2.37 for targeted therapy alone, respectively. CONCLUSION Use of SACT at the EOL increased significantly over time, driven by increased use of immunotherapy. SACT use at the EOL, regardless of its type, was associated with high health services use and hospital death. Guidelines on the use of SACT at the EOL should include novel cancer treatments.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 30
Published October 20, 2025
Pages 3279-3291
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

J

Javaid Iqbal

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom

R

Rahim Moineddin

K

Kieran L. Quinn

C

Christopher M. Booth

Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

C

Craig C. Earle

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

S

Stephanie Lheureux

R

Robert Grant

Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

J

Jenny Lau

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

L

Lisa W. Le

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

P

Peter Tanuseputro

J

James Downar

G

Gary Rodin

H

Hsien Seow

1McMaster University, Oncology, Hamilton, Canada

J

Jillian Tsai

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, and Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

R

Robert A. Fowler

B

Breffni Hannon

Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada

M

Monika K. Krzyzanowska

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

C

Camilla Zimmermann