Olaparib as Treatment Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: Phase III SOLO3 Study Final Overall Survival Results

G Giovanni Scambia R Ricardo Villalobos Valencia (Centro Medico Dalinde, Mexico City, Mexico) N Nicoletta Colombo D David Cibula C Charles A. Leath M Mariusz Bidzinski (Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland) J Jae-Weon Kim (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea) J Joo Hyun Nam (Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea) R Radoslaw Madry (Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland) C Carlos Hernandez P Paulo A.R. Mora (Instituto COI de Educação e Pesquisa, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) S Sang Young Ryu (Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea) M Mei-Lin Ah-See (Oncology R&D, Late-stage Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom) E Elizabeth S. Lowe (Oncology R&D, Late-stage Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD) N Natalia Lukashchuk D Dave Carter R Richard T. Penson

Abstract

Olaparib treatment significantly improved objective response rate (primary end point) and progression-free survival versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the open-label phase III SOLO3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02282020 ). We report final overall survival (OS; prespecified secondary end point), post hoc OS analysis by number of previous chemotherapy lines, and exploratory BRCA reversion mutation analysis. Two hundred sixty-six patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily; n = 178) or physician's choice of single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan; n = 88). OS was similar with olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.49]; P = .71, median 34.9 and 32.9 months, respectively, full analysis set). OS with olaparib was favorable in patients with two previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 0.83 [olaparib v chemotherapy] [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.38]; median 37.9 v 28.8 months); however, a potential detrimental effect was seen in patients with at least three previous chemotherapy lines (HR, 1.33 [95% CI, 0.84 to 2.18]; median 29.9 v 39.4 months). BRCA reversion mutations might have contributed to this finding. No patient randomly assigned to olaparib with a BRCA reversion mutation detected at baseline (6 of 170 [3.5%]) achieved an objective tumor response.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 12
Published April 20, 2025
Pages 1408-1416
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

G

Giovanni Scambia

R

Ricardo Villalobos Valencia

Centro Medico Dalinde, Mexico City, Mexico

N

Nicoletta Colombo

D

David Cibula

C

Charles A. Leath

M

Mariusz Bidzinski

Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

J

Jae-Weon Kim

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

J

Joo Hyun Nam

Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

R

Radoslaw Madry

Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

C

Carlos Hernandez

P

Paulo A.R. Mora

Instituto COI de Educação e Pesquisa, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

S

Sang Young Ryu

Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea

M

Mei-Lin Ah-See

Oncology R&D, Late-stage Development, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom

E

Elizabeth S. Lowe

Oncology R&D, Late-stage Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD

N

Natalia Lukashchuk

D

Dave Carter

R

Richard T. Penson