Omission of completion axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer and sentinel lymph node macrometastases: Overall survival and patient-reported arm morbidity from the randomized SENOMAC trial.
Abstract
LBA503 Background: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) causes arm-related morbidity. The SENOMAC trial evaluates whether the omission of completion ALND in patients with 1-2 sentinel lymph node (SLN) macrometastases is oncologically safe. It differs from previous trials in size and the inclusion of larger tumors and patients receiving mastectomy. Methods: SENOMAC (NCT02240472) is an international non-inferiority trial. Adult patients with primary invasive, clinically node-negative T1-3 breast cancer and up to two SLN macrometastases were randomized 1:1 to completion ALND (standard) or its omission (intervention). Adjuvant treatment followed standards of care. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), requiring 190 deaths to conclude non-inferiority (upper one-sided 90% CI for the hazard ratio < 1.44) with ALND as the reference group. The secondary endpoint breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) required 66 breast cancer deaths. Patient-reported outcomes were recorded 1, 3, and 5 years after randomization by the questionnaires Lymph-ICF (arm morbidity), EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 (health-related quality of life). Results: From 1/2015 to 12/2021, 2766 patients were randomized in 5 countries. The per-protocol population comprised 2540 patients (1205 randomized to ALND and 1335 to its omission). The median follow-up was 60.1 months (1.5-122.7 months). Questionnaire response rates were 81.3% and 74.6% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Overall, 196 patients died, 75 of whom due to breast cancer. Five-year OS was 93.4% (95% CI 91.9%-94.9%) in the ALND and 94.4% (95% CI 93.1%-95.7%) in the omission group, with a country-adjusted hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI 0.64-1.12). Five-year BCSS was 97.3% (95% CI 96.4%-98.3%) in the ALND and 97.8% (95% CI 97.0%-98.6%) in the omission group, with a country-adjusted hazard ratio of 0.86 (95% CI 0.55-1.34). Both endpoints fell significantly (p = 0.238 for OS and p = 0.504 for BCSS) below the pre-specified non-inferiority margin. Arm physical function according to the Lymph-ICF questionnaire was significantly better in the omission than the ALND group with a clinically relevant mean score difference of 6.14 at 3 years (95% CI 5.00-7.43, p < 0.001) and 5.71 at 5 years (95% CI 4.46-7.25, p < 0.001). Similarly, arm symptoms according to EORTC QLQ-BR23 were significantly more pronounced in the ALND than the omission group both after 3 (mean score 20.80+/-21.24 versus mean score 10.83+/-15.48, p < 0.001) and after 5 years (mean score 19.40+/-21.07 versus mean score 9.31+/-15.58, p < 0.001). Global health-related quality of life did not show any statistically significant differences after 3 and 5 years. Conclusions: Omission of completion ALND after a positive SLN biopsy is oncologically safe and mitigates postoperative patient-reported arm morbidity. Clinical trial information: NCT02240472 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Jana de Boniface
Department of Surgery, Capio St. Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm
Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark 4 Department of Breast Surgery, Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
Lisa Rydén
Robert Szulkin
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Matilda Appelgren
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Toralf Reimer
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
Thorsten Kühn
Hospital Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany
Michalis Kontos
Department of Surgery, University of Athens Laiko Hospital, Athens, Greece
Oreste Davide Gentilini
Breast Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute/Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
Roger Olofsson Bagge
Malin Sund
Dan Lundstedt
Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden and Department of Oncology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, Göteborg, Sweden
Johan Ahlgren
Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden and Regional Cancer Centre of Mid-Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden
Sara Alkner
Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden and Skåne University Hospital Lund, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
Yvette Andersson
Department of Surgery, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Vasteras, Sweden and Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University and Region Vastmanland, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Västerås, Sweden
Birgitte Vrou Offersen
Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark and Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark
Leif Bergkvist
Center for Clinical Research, Uppsala University, Västmanland Central Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
Jan Frisell
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Peer Christiansen