Outcomes of nephrectomy in patients with pathologic complete response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for renal cell carcinoma: A multicenter study.

A Alireza Ghoreifi (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC) F Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) S Sina Sobhani (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) M Michael Basin (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) C Carlos Rivera Lopez E Emma K. Helstrom (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) E Ekamjit S. Deol (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) Z Zine-Eddine Khene (UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX) I Inderbir Gill (USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) R Robert Houston Thompson (Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) I Isamu Tachibana (Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) A Abhinav Khanna (Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) R Randall Lee (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) R Robert Uzzo (Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) V Vitaly Margulis N Nirmish Singla H Hooman Djaladat (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Laton, CA)

Abstract

454 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapy has become the standard of care for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). A pathologic complete response (pCR) in the primary tumor may be observed in up to one-third of patients; however, data on the outcomes of these patients remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who achieved a pCR following ICI therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced RCC who underwent nephrectomy following ICI therapy were evaluated across five high-volume U.S. academic centers between 2015 and 2023. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between those with and without a pCR in the primary tumor (ypT0N0/Nx). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with pCR. Recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Results: A total of 182 patients were included (Table 1). Among all patients, downstaging to ≤ypT1N0/Nx was observed in 45 patients (25%), of whom 21 (11%) achieved a pCR. In multivariable analysis, the presence of clinical thrombus was marginally associated with a lower likelihood of achieving pCR (odds ratio [95% CI]: 0.39 [0.15–1.00], p=0.06). During a median follow-up of 25 months, 70 patients (38%) experienced recurrence, including 4 (2%) in the pCR group. Median time to recurrence was 7.5 months. KM analysis demonstrated a higher estimated 5-year RFS in the pCR group compared to those with residual disease; however, the difference was not statistically significant (68% vs. 54%, p=0.2). In addition, OS rates were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: In our cohort, 11% of patients who underwent nephrectomy following ICI therapy for advanced RCC showed pCR, which correlated with improved oncologic outcomes. Despite the lower recurrence rates observed in the pCR group, sustained long-term surveillance remains necessary due to the continued, albeit reduced, risk of disease recurrence. Clinical characteristics of patients who underwent post-ICI nephrectomy, stratified by their pathologic complete response (pCR). Variable pCR (n=21) No pCR (n=161) p-value Median (IQR) age, year 61 (56 – 70) 64 (56 – 71) 0.46 Gender (male), n (%) 15 (71) 118 (73) 0.8 Tumor advancement, n (%) Locally advanced Metastatic 2 (10)19 (90) 36 (22)125 (78) 0.26 Risk group (for metastatic), n (%) Favorable Intermediate Poor 3 (25)6 (50)3 (25) 38 (34)59 (54)13 (12) 0.42 ICI regimen, n (%) ICI monotherapy ICI+ICI ICI+TKI 4 (19)9 (43)8 (38) 46 (28)64 (40)51 (32) 0.64 Immunotherapy cycles (>4), n (%) 8 (50) 49 (37) 0.42 Median (IQR) clinical tumor size, cm 9.3 (6.7 – 11.9) 8.4 (6.6 – 12) 0.68 Clinical nodal involvement, n (%) 8 (38) 53 (33) 0.63 Clinical thrombus, n (%) 12 (57) 60 (37) 0.1 ICI: immune checkpoint inhibitor; TKI: tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 454-454
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Alireza Ghoreifi

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

F

Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

S

Sina Sobhani

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

M

Michael Basin

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

C

Carlos Rivera Lopez

E

Emma K. Helstrom

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

E

Ekamjit S. Deol

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

Z

Zine-Eddine Khene

UT Southwestern, Dallas, TX

I

Inderbir Gill

USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

R

Robert Houston Thompson

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

I

Isamu Tachibana

Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

A

Abhinav Khanna

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

R

Randall Lee

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

R

Robert Uzzo

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

V

Vitaly Margulis

N

Nirmish Singla

H

Hooman Djaladat

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Laton, CA