Outcomes of systemic therapy followed by surgery for synchronous liver metastases from pancreatic cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

R Ruili Wei (China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China) J Jia Huang Y Yuan Ding Y Yongsu Ma Y Yue Qiu (Grimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation, School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, Faculty of Arts University of Melbourne Parkville) X Xizhou Zhang (Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, and Cancer Center, The Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital and the Affiliated People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China) H Huikai Li R Renyi Qin (Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China) Y Yinmo Yang H Huaizhi Wang (Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering) Y Yiping Mou W Weilin Wang Z Zhiying Yang (Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery China−Japan Friendship Hospital Beijing 100029 China)

Abstract

e16365 Background: The role of surgical intervention in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with synchronous liver metastases (sPDACLM) remains controversial. While systemic therapy is the mainstay, select patients demonstrating significant response may benefit from surgery. This study aimed to identify optimal criteria for selecting patients with sPDACLM for conversion surgery. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with sPDACLM from seven Chinese centers (2017-2025). Key inclusion criteria were age ≥18, ECOG 0-1, biopsy-proven PDAC with liver metastases, and completion of ≥4 cycles of first-line systemic therapy. Patients were stratified by primary tumor resectability into an "Intention-to-Conversion Surgery (ITCS)" group (resectable/borderline resectable primary tumor) and a "Maintenance Therapy" group (unresectable primary tumor). Treatment response was assessed radiographically (RECIST 1.1 Partial Response [PR]) and biochemically (CA19-9 decline > 85% or normalization); patients meeting both criteria were classified as "Dual Responder." The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Of 175 eligible patients, 135 were in the ITCS group and 40 in the maintenance therapy group. The median OS for the entire cohort was 13 months. The ITCS group had significantly longer median OS than the maintenance therapy group (14.0 vs. 11.4 months, P = 0.015). Multivariate analysis confirmed biochemical response, radiographic response, and baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as independent prognostic factors for OS. "Dual responder" (n = 46/175, 26.3%) had a significantly superior median OS of 23.0 months compared to 11.0 months in non-responders (P < 0.001). Within the ITCS group (n = 135), "Dual responder" (n = 46, 34.1%) achieved a median OS of 24.8 months versus 11.0 months in non-responders (P < 0.001). Among these 46 "Dual responder," those who underwent surgery (n = 22) had a significantly longer median OS than those who did not (31.9 vs. 18.0 months, P = 0.05), with a 5-year survival rate of 19%. In contrast, for patients not meeting the dual criteria (n = 89), surgery did not confer a significant long-term OS benefit despite potential short-term improvement. Conclusions: The "Dual response" criteria—combining radiographic partial response (RECIST 1.1 PR) and a major biochemical response (CA19-9 decline > 85% or normalization)—effectively identifies a subgroup of patients with sPDACLM who may derive significant survival benefit from conversion surgery. Surgical intervention is not recommended for patients who fail to meet these dual criteria. These findings provide a practical framework for patient selection in the multimodal management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with synchronous liver metastases.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

R

Ruili Wei

China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

J

Jia Huang

Y

Yuan Ding

Y

Yongsu Ma

Y

Yue Qiu

Grimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation, School of Historical and Philosophical Studies, Faculty of Arts University of Melbourne Parkville

X

Xizhou Zhang

Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, and Cancer Center, The Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital and the Affiliated People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China

H

Huikai Li

R

Renyi Qin

Department of Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Y

Yinmo Yang

H

Huaizhi Wang

Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering

Y

Yiping Mou

W

Weilin Wang

Z

Zhiying Yang

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery China−Japan Friendship Hospital Beijing 100029 China