Overall survival by genomic profile in HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC): A large US clinico-genomic database study.
Abstract
1045 Background: Over the past few years, the landscape of treatment for HER2+ breast cancer has evolved significantly. Multiple active 1L treatment options have emerged, including T-DXd plus pertuzumab, maintenance palbociclib or tucatinib, providing an opportunity to tailor treatment according to the disease profile. This study aims to describe real-world treatment patterns and evaluate overall survival (OS) in a modern cohort of patients with HER2+ mBC, with sub-analysis by genetic profile of the disease. Methods: This retrospective study used the Flatiron Clinico-Genomic database (CGDB), where each patient received at least one Foundation Medicine next generation sequencing (NGS) test along the course of disease. Adults (≥18 years) diagnosed with HER2+ mBC between 1 January 2018 and 31 March 2024 (one year prior to the data cutoff) were included. OS was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method, with descriptive analyses by genetic alteration. Results: Among 7,933 mBC patients who underwent NGS profiling, 732 (9.2%) patients with HER2+ mBC were included. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range: 23-85); 68.3% had hormone receptor positive disease, and 37% had de novo mBC. Patients received a median of 3 lines of therapy (range: 1–14). The use of anti-HER2 antibodies ranged from 59.4% to 33.6% across 1L through 5L. Trastuzumab deruxtecan was prescribed more often in later lines (23.9% for 3L, 19.6% for 4L, and 23.0% for 5L) compared to 2L and 1L (11.3% and 4.2%). Similarly, the use of anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors increased in later lines. The median (95% CI) OS for the entire population was 48 (41.6-53.1) months, with notable differences based on the detection of key genetic alterations. Patients with mutations in DNMT3A (14.2%), ARID1A (11.9%), MLL2 (10.9%), and CHEK2 (9%) had numerically longer mOS (64 [49.5-NE], 51.4 [35.8-69.4], 51.4 [36.1-68.9], 51.4 [40.1-NE] months, respectively) while patients with mutations in BRCA1 (6.6%), CDH1 (10.9%), BRCA2 (10.9%), PIK3CA (37.4%), TP53 (59.6%), ERBB2 (11.5%), and ATM (12.7%) experienced numerically shorter mOS (36 [25.0-56.3], 40.1 [28.0-70.1], 40.1 [34.1-62.5], 40.1 [35.2-46.9], 40.6 [35.9-48.7], 43.3 [36.2-58.9], 44.3 [36.5-62.8] months, respectively). Conclusions: The present study provides key insights into clinico-genomic characteristics, modern treatment patterns and OS for HER2+ mBC patients in the US. Although survival was 4 years in the overall cohort, patients with mutations in key DNA repair genes (BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, TP53), in CDH1, PIK3CA or ERBB2 experienced a numerically worse prognosis, representing key unmet needs for drug development.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (4)
Paolo Tarantino
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Xiaodan Mai
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT
Jay Soh
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT
Rani Bansal
Department of Medical Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC