P3BEP (ANZUP 1302): An international randomized phase 3 trial of accelerated versus standard BEP chemotherapy for individuals aged 11-50 years with intermediate and poor-risk metastatic germ cell tumours (GCTs).
Abstract
TPS623 Background: Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) given 3-weekly x 4 is standard first-line chemotherapy for intermediate and poor-risk metastatic GCT. Acceleration of standard chemotherapy regimens by shortening the cycle length to 2-weekly improved cure rates in other cancers. P3BEP is the first international, randomized trial of chemotherapy for intermediate and poor-risk metastatic GCT to include adults and children of both sexes. It aims to determine the superiority of accelerated BEP versus standard BEP in this setting. Methods: This open label, randomized, phase 3 trial is conducted seamlessly in 2 stages. The primary endpoint for stage 1 (n = 150) was favourable response; and for stage 2 (n = 500) is progression free survival (PFS). These sample sizes provide > 80% power with a two-sided type I error rate of 5% to detect absolute improvements of 21% in the favourable response rate (stage 1), and of 7% in PFS rates at 2 years (stage 2). The target population is males and females aged 11 to 50 with intermediate-risk or poor-risk metastatic GCT of the testis, ovary, retroperitoneum, or mediastinum. Participants are randomized (1:1) to 4 cycles of standard BEP (3-weekly) or accelerated BEP (2-weekly) with cisplatin 20mg/m 2 D1-5, etoposide 100mg/m 2 D1-5, bleomycin 30,000 IU/m 2 weekly x 12, and pegylated G-CSF 6mg D6 or filgrastim daily. Study assessments occur at 30 days after completing chemotherapy, 6 months from randomization, and after completion of all post-chemotherapy treatments (e.g. surgery). Tumour tissue and baseline blood samples are collected for translational substudies. As of 25 September 2025, 380 participants have been recruited from 22 ANZ sites, 18 UK sites (led by Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit), and 167 USA sites (led by Children’s Oncology Group). The first planned interim analysis for safety (n = 76) identified no safety concerns. The stage 1 analysis of safety and activity (response rate) for the first 150 patients was reviewed by the Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee, which recommended continuation of the trial as per protocol. Clinical trial information: NCT02582697 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Blossom Mak
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Ben Tran
Hayley Thomas
Rick Walker
Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
Farzana Pashankar
3Yale School of Medicine, Pediatrics, New Haven, United States
Darren R. Feldman
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
Aaron Richard Hansen
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Robert A. Huddart
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
Elaine Dunwoodie
St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
Matthew Wheater
University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
Amanda Gwendolyn Stevanovic
Nepean Cancer Care Centre, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
Danish Mazhar
Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Nicola Jane Lawrence
Te Toka Tuma Auckland, Te Whatu Ora, Health New Zealand, and Department of Oncology, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Alison Jane Birtle
University of Manchester, Manchester, University of Lancashire and Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
Olabode Oladipo
Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom
David Wyld
Jay Michael S. Balagtas
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
Martin R. Stockler
Peter S. Grimison
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia