Patient-reported outcomes in resected renal cell carcinoma: Active monitoring vs. durvalumab and tremelimumab in the RAMPART trial.
Abstract
420 Background: Durvalumab + Tremelimumab (DT) given over one year (with Tremelimumab at Day 1 and Week 4), improved disease-free survival in patients with resected renal cell carcinoma at intermediate/high risk of relapse in the RAMPART trial. Evaluating quality of life (QoL) is key to understanding the overall impact of treatment. The primary QoL outcome in RAMPART was the change in overall health and quality of life (OHQL) from baseline to 15 months, and no difference was observed between participants assigned DT versus active monitoring (AM). We now present detailed QoL outcomes from the comparison of DT versus AM. Methods: This analysis includes participants randomly assigned (3:2) to AM or DT, who participated in the optional QoL sub study and completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline plus ≥1 follow-up (Week 16 or Month 15). Outcomes assessed include OHQL (Q29–30) at Week 16, five functional domains, eight symptom domains, and financial difficulties at both Week 16 and Month 15. Clinically meaningful differences (CMD) were predefined by item and scale. Results: A total of 254 participants were included (150 AM, 104 DT). Baseline characteristics were similar, with minor differences in sex distribution (male: 68% AM vs 74% DT) and performance status (PS 0: 80% AM vs 88% DT; PS 1: 20% AM vs 12% DT). At week 16, scores were worse in those assigned DT rather than AM for OHQL (–8.1; 95% CI: –12.8 to –3.4; p = 0.0008), role function (–6.0; 95% CI: –11.9 to –0.2; p = 0.04), fatigue (8.4; 95% CI: 3.2 to 13.7; p = 0.002), and insomnia (8.9; 95% CI: 1.3 to 16.4; p = 0.02). All exceeded the minimum threshold for a small CMD (CMD: OHQL 4–<10, role function 6–<19, fatigue 5–<13, insomnia 4–<13). At month 15, scores were worse in those assigned DT rather than AM for pain (8.8; 95% CI: 1.4 to 16.2; p = 0.02) and cognitive function (–5.8; 95% CI: –11.5 to –0.2; p = 0.04), both exceeding the predefined thresholds for a small CMD (CMD: pain 6–<13, cognitive function 3–<9). No other domains, symptom scales, or single items met both statistical and clinical thresholds at either timepoint. Conclusions: DT was associated with worse QoL at week 16 than AM, particularly in OHQL, role function, fatigue and sleep, all reaching clinically meaningful thresholds. These effects appeared to improve by month 15. At month 15, pain and cognitive function were worse in the DT arm. These findings should be considered alongside the DFS benefit when discussing treatment options with patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03288532 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Sophie Merrick
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
Laura Murphy
MRC (Medical Research Council) Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London
Elena Frangou
University College London, London, United Kingdom
Hannah Rush
Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Hannah Plant
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
Matthew Guy Nankivell
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
Duncan C. Gilbert
MRC (Medical Research Council) Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, London
Paul D. Nathan
Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, United Kingdom
Grant D. Stewart
Craig Gedye
Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia
Axel Bex
Tim Eisen
Ian D. Davis
School of Medicine, Monash University
Balaji Venugopal
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Thomas Powles
Department of Medical Oncology Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK
Mahesh Parmar
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom
Martin R. Stockler
James M.G. Larkin
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Angela Mary Meade
Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, London, United Kingdom