Patterns of radiological progression in participants (pts) with embolization-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with durvalumab (D) + bevacizumab (B) + transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and placebos + TACE: EMERALD-1 post hoc analysis.
Abstract
574 Background: EMERALD-1 (NCT03778957) met its primary endpoint, demonstrating improved progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with locoregional HCC treated with D + B + TACE versus placebos (PBO) + TACE (stratified Cox proportional hazards hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61–0.98 [Lencioni R, et al. J Clin Oncol 2024;42(suppl 3). Abs LBA432]). This post hoc analysis assessed outcomes by radiological progression pattern in pts treated with D + B + TACE or PBO + TACE. Methods: Pts included in this analysis received D (1500 mg) or PBO for D (Q4W) in combination with conventional (c)- or drug-eluting bead (DEB)-TACE (investigator choice, 1–4 TACE procedures within 16 weeks). Subsequently, pts received D (1120 mg) + B (15 mg/kg), or PBO for D + B (Q3W). This study analyzed radiological progression patterns at the time of first progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the investigator per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. A new lesion was classified as a new intrahepatic lesion (NIH) or new extrahepatic lesion (NEH); tumor growth of existing intrahepatic lesions (increase of ≥20% of an existing target lesion with at least >5 mm absolute increase or unequivocal PD with a non-target lesion) was classified as intrahepatic growth (IHG; categories were not mutually exclusive). Efficacy was assessed by time to progression (TTP). Results: In the D + B + TACE arm, 53.9% of pts had PD, and in the PBO + TACE arm 79.0% of pts had PD. The most common pattern of disease progression across both treatment arms was NIH, occurring in 73 (35.8%) and 107 (52.2%) pts in the D + B + TACE and PBO + TACE arms, respectively, with 31 (15.2%) and 34 (16.6%) pts exhibiting IHG, and 24 (11.8%) and 39 (19.0%) pts exhibiting NEH, respectively. Improved TTP was observed in pts treated with D + B + TACE versus PBO + TACE, regardless of progression pattern (Table). Conclusions: Overall, the rate of progression was lower with D + B + TACE compared with PBO + TACE. The pattern of disease progression observed with D + B + TACE and PBO + TACE was similar, with NIH the most common pattern of progression in both treatment arms. Consistent benefit in TTP was observed with D + B + TACE versus PBO + TACE, regardless of progression pattern. Clinical trial information: NCT03778957 . NIH IHG NEH D + B + TACE (n=73) PBO + TACE (n=107) D + B + TACE (n=31) PBO + TACE (n=34) D + B + TACE (n=24) PBO + TACE (n=39) Median (95% CI) TTP, months 13.7 (10.8–16.5) 8.8 (7.0–10.9) 5.1 (3.0–9.0) 4.3 (2.9–4.8) 6.7 (2.8–16.6) 4.6 (2.9–6.8) HR (95% CI)* 0.78 (0.57–1.07) 0.61 (0.36–1.03) 0.66 (0.36–1.15) *HR and CI were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model, the CI was calculated using a profile likelihood approach.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (18)
Bruno Sangro
Mohamed Bouattour
Medical Oncology, AP-HP Hôpital Beaujon, Paris, France
Joong-Won Park
National Cancer Center and Myongji Hospital, Goyang, South Korea
Dr. Consuelo Diaz
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico
Joseph P. Erinjeri
Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Gustavo Vasconcelos Alves
Centro Integrado de Pesquisa em Oncologia, Hospital Nossa Senhora de Conceição, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Shan-Zhi Gu
Department of Interventional Radiology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
Aleksei Manikhas
Oncology Department, City Clinical Oncological Dispensary, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Hidekatsu Kuroda
Thatthan Suksombooncharoen
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
Truc Hoi Trung Vo
Liver Tumor Department, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
Vikas S. Ostwal
Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
Melissa A. Eastgate
School of Medicine, University of Queensland and Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Gina M. Vaccaro
Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
Rebecca Griffin
Oncology Biometrics, Late Oncology Statistics, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Sajid Ali
Kavitha Balaji
Global Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD
Stephen Lam Chan