Performance of a 52-gene NGS panel combined with shallow WGS for accurate HRD analysis.

P Paul Kubelac Milan (Oncology Institute Cluj Napoca, Napoca, Romania) I Iulian Hotinceanu (Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania) A Andreea Truican (Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania) M Mioara-Maria Caldaraș (Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania) V Vlad Alexandru Manolescu (Amethyst Cluj Napoca, Floresti; Cluj Napoca, Romania) I Iulia Monica Groza (Oncology Institute, Clus-Napoca, Romania) C Cristian-Ervin Gal (Euroclinic Regina Maria, Bucharest, Romania) D Dana Lucia Stanculeanu (University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila“ & Institute of Oncology Bucharest "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu”, Bucuresti, Romania) A Aurelia Alexandru P Polixenia Iorga (Elias University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania) D Dragos Mircea Median (Filantropia Clinical Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania) L Loredana Tuinea (Filantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania) B Bogdan Gafton (Regional Oncology Institute, Iasi, Romania) S Simona Volovaţ (Regional Oncology Institute, Iași, Romania) R Rareș Tiberiu Moldovan (Piatra Neamţ County Hospital, Piatra Neamţ, Romania) N Norina Macra (Oncohelp Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania) D Daniela Nagy (Oncohelp Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania) F Florinel Pop (Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania) E Eirini Papadopoulou G George Nasioulas

Abstract

e17570 Background: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is a pivotal biomarker for predicting response to PARP inhibitors in multiple cancers. This study evaluates the analytical performance of a 53-gene somatic NGS panel combined with low-pass whole genome sequencing (shallow WGS, sWGS) for HRD assessment. Methods: In the present study, 36 FFPE tissues from ovarian cancer patients were analyzed for 52 genes implicated in DNA repair pathways, along with sWGS for the evaluation of tumor genomic instability (GI). Libraries were generated with the KAPA HyperPlus Kit (Roche) and sequenced in duplicate using the Avity sequencing instrument (Element Bioscience) and the DNBSEQ-G400 NGS platform, subsequent to conversion for compatibility with MGI chemistry. HRD positivity was defined as either the presence of pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutations or high GI. Data analysis was performed using the SeqOne platform. The performance of the sWGS assay in detecting GI was initially assessed using the OncoScan CNV assay for 15 samples, as well as 4 reference materials with known HRD status. The efficacy of sWGS was also evaluated by comparing its agreement with the GI scores obtained from the validated HRD test (Myriad MyChoice) in 21 samples. Results: A 93% agreement was observed between the sWGS assay and OncoScan, demonstrating strong concordance. Additionally, the assay accurately evaluated the HRD status in all 4 reference samples with known values. The results obtained were highly similar between the two sequencing platforms. In addition, shallow NGS achieved >95% overall percentage agreement (OPA) with the validated HRD test for genomic instability score (Table 1). 5 of the 6 samples with discordant GI findings between Myriad and OncoScan aligned with the Myriad results when analyzed with sWGS. This implies that sWGS has the potential to resolve the discrepancies that were observed with OncoScan, thereby indicating its reliability as a robust alternative for HRD analysis. Conclusions: The assay demonstrated robust performance in detecting HRD-associated genomic signatures, supporting its applicability in clinical use. The reliability of the NGS assay for clinical use is guaranteed by its high concordance (95%) with the validated test, which entails the incorporation of shallow WGS for HRD analysis. Concordance between Myriad MyChoice and shallow WGS. Validated HRD Test HRD + HRD - PPV NPV OPA r Shallow WGS HRD HRD + 13 0 100% 88% 95.24% 0.9014 HRD - 1 7 p< .00001

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

P

Paul Kubelac Milan

Oncology Institute Cluj Napoca, Napoca, Romania

I

Iulian Hotinceanu

Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania

A

Andreea Truican

Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania

M

Mioara-Maria Caldaraș

Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania

V

Vlad Alexandru Manolescu

Amethyst Cluj Napoca, Floresti; Cluj Napoca, Romania

I

Iulia Monica Groza

Oncology Institute, Clus-Napoca, Romania

C

Cristian-Ervin Gal

Euroclinic Regina Maria, Bucharest, Romania

D

Dana Lucia Stanculeanu

University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Carol Davila“ & Institute of Oncology Bucharest "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu”, Bucuresti, Romania

A

Aurelia Alexandru

P

Polixenia Iorga

Elias University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

D

Dragos Mircea Median

Filantropia Clinical Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

L

Loredana Tuinea

Filantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

B

Bogdan Gafton

Regional Oncology Institute, Iasi, Romania

S

Simona Volovaţ

Regional Oncology Institute, Iași, Romania

R

Rareș Tiberiu Moldovan

Piatra Neamţ County Hospital, Piatra Neamţ, Romania

N

Norina Macra

Oncohelp Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania

D

Daniela Nagy

Oncohelp Timișoara, Timișoara, Romania

F

Florinel Pop

Genekor Medical S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania

E

Eirini Papadopoulou

G

George Nasioulas