Perioperative (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) apalutamide (APA) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs placebo (PBO) + ADT with radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (HR LPC/LAPC): Final analysis of the PROTEUS phase 3 study.
Abstract
LBA1 Background: RP is potentially curative for patients (pts) with HR LPC/LAPC, yet ≈50% of pts relapse. PROTEUS evaluated whether APA + ADT vs PBO + ADT before and after RP with pelvic lymph node dissection (henceforth, RP) improves pathologic complete response/minimal residual disease (pCR/MRD) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) in HR LPC/LAPC. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed HR LPC/LAPC (histology, prostate-specific antigen [PSA], and cN0/cN1 on conventional imaging) were randomized 1:1 to blinded APA (240 mg/d) or PBO as neoadjuvant treatment (tx) for 6 mo + ADT, with a 2-wk break prior to and a 4-wk break post RP, followed by 6 mo of assigned tx. Dual primary end points, pCR/MRD (≤ypT2, ≤5 mm tumor diameter) and MFS based on conventional or prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging, were assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points included event-free survival (EFS), time to first subsequent tx (TTST1), time to distant metastasis (TTDM), and safety. Exploratory end points included residual cancer burden (RCB/MRD; ≤ypT2, ≤0.25 cm 3 ) and investigator-assessed MFS. Results: Of 2109 pts randomized (APA + ADT [1057] or PBO + ADT [1052]), median (range) age was 66.0 (41-89) years (y); PSA, 14.8 (0.0-2798.0) ng/mL; GS ≥8, 95.8%. Median follow-up was 61.7 mo. Both primary end points were met with APA + ADT vs PBO + ADT: pCR/MRD rate was significantly higher, 8.9% vs 1.0% (odds ratio [OR] 10.17; 95% CI 5.27-19.64; p<0.0001); MFS by BICR was significantly improved with HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.96; p=0.0169 and 5-y MFS rate of 78.2% vs 73.5%; median not reached [NR]. Investigator-assessed MFS favored APA + ADT, with HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.62-0.87; nominal p=0.0004. EFS, TTST1, TTDM were all significantly improved with APA + ADT (Table), as was RCB/MRD: MRD 30.6% vs 11.7%; OR 3.36; 95% CI 2.67-4.23; nominal p<0.0001. Grade 3/4 tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for APA + ADT vs PBO + ADT were 39.6% vs 31.0%, with discontinuation due to TEAEs 7.4% vs 2.7%, respectively. Conclusions: APA + ADT significantly increased the curative success of RP in pts with HR LPC/LAPC, with a 10-fold higher odds of pCR/MRD and a clinically meaningful 20% reduction in risk of distant metastasis or death. Secondary end points all favored APA + ADT. These results support combined APA + ADT and RP as a new standard of care for pts with HR LPC/LAPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03767244 . HR(95% CI) p Value a APA + ADTn=1057Median (mo) PBO + ADTn=1052Median (mo) EFS 0.71(0.63-0.80) <0.0001 57.1 38.4 TTST1 (local, regional, or systemic, including ADT reinitiation) 0.65(0.57-0.73) <0.0001 74.2 41.5 TTDM (conventional or PSMA PET imaging) 0.68(0.55-0.83) 0.0002 NR NR a Stratified by GS (7, ≥8), nodal status, and geographic region (North America, European Union, rest of world).
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Mary-Ellen Taplin
Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
Martin Gleave
Vancouver Prostate Centre
Neal D. Shore
START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC
Angela Lopez-Gitlitz
Johnson & Johnson, Los Angeles
Alexander Kretschmer
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Eleni Efstathiou
Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
Ronaldo Damião
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro
Toshiyuki Kamoto
University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki City, Japan
Ashley Ross
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago
Alberto Briganti
Urological Research Institute, Comprehensive Cancer Center, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan
Boris A. Hadaschik
University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
Axel Heidenreich
Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Álvaro Juárez Soto
Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz, Spain
Oliver Brendan Rooney
Johnson & Johnson, High Wycombe, United Kingdom
Shaozhou Ken Tian
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Lisa Wetherhold
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Branko Miladinovic
Johnson & Johnson, San Diego, CA
Sharon McCarthy
Johnson & Johnson, Bridgewater, NJ
Christopher P. Evans
University of Nevada, Reno
Adam S. Kibel
Mass General Brigham, Boston