Pharmacovigilance signals of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in non-geriatric men with prostate cancer: A FAERS disproportionality analysis.

O Onur Alkan (Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey) I Ismail Nazlı (Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey) A Ahmet Başgöze (Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey) M Mahmut Gümüş (Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

e17045 Background: Age-restricted real-world safety patterns of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) in prostate cancer are incompletely characterized. We evaluated adverse event (AE) reporting signals for enzalutamide, abiraterone, apalutamide, and darolutamide in non-geriatric men. Methods: FAERS (Q4/2003–Q3/2025) was queried via OpenVigil 2.1. Included were male patients aged 18–64 years with an ARPI as the primary suspect drug. AEs were analyzed at MedDRA preferred term level. Disproportionality analysis was performed using reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); signals were defined as PRR≥2 and χ²≥4. Results: Among 1,594,913 background cases, 4,570 ARPI cases were identified (abiraterone n = 2,060; enzalutamide n = 1,812; apalutamide n = 394; darolutamide n = 304). Fatigue was reported across all ARPIs, with enzalutamide showing a ROR of 5.48 (4.83, 6.23) (n = 280) and darolutamide a ROR of 4.79 (3.46, 6.64) (n = 42). Rash with apalutamide showed a ROR of 4.65 (3.27, 6.61), and hypertension with apalutamide showed a ROR of 3.44 (2.02, 5.87) . Abiraterone demonstrated signals including long QT syndrome with a ROR of 12.54 (4.67, 33.72), hypokalemia with a ROR of 4.80 (3.12, 7.39) (n = 21), blood pressure increased with a ROR of 2.15 (1.51, 3.07) , and liver function test increased with a ROR of 7.92 (4.75, 13.19) (n = 15). Memory impairment with enzalutamide showed a ROR of 2.23 (1.46, 3.40) (n = 22). Seizure did not meet signal criteria and was not observed with darolutamide. Conclusions: In men aged 18–64 years, ARPIs display distinct FAERS reporting signals that may inform agent-tailored monitoring. Fatigue remains a cross-ARPI signal, including with darolutamide. Findings require validation in prospective studies. Selected disproportionality signals (ROR) for ARPIs. Adverse Event Enzalutamide (N=1,812) Abiraterone (N=2,060) Apalutamide (N=394) Darolutamide (N=304) Fatigue 5.48 (4.82–6.23) 2.80 (2.39–3.26) 3.38 (2.43–4.68) 4.79 (3.46–6.64) Seizure 0.85 (0.52–1.38) 0.32 (0.15–0.68) 0.48 (0.12–1.94) 0 (NA) Rash 0.77 (0.53–1.12) 0.53 (0.35–0.81) 4.65 (3.27–6.61) 2.02 (1.14–3.60) Hypertension 0.83 (0.51–1.36) 1.99 (1.47–2.70) 3.44 (2.02–5.87) 0.93 (0.30–2.90) Asthenia 2.11 (1.63–2.72) 1.69 (1.29–2.20) 1.60 (0.85–3.00) 4.79 (3.11–7.40) Falls 1.54 (1.04–2.26) 2.04 (1.48–2.80) 1.36 (0.56–3.28) 1.41 (0.52–3.77) Cardiac Failure 0.82 (0.37–1.84) 0.56 (0.21–1.50) 0.63 (0.09–4.49) 2.89 (0.93–9.01) Values are ROR (95% CI); n indicates the number of FAERS cases reporting the PT with the ARPI as primary suspect. Disproportionality estimates from FAERS are subject to under-reporting, reporting bias, and confounding; causality cannot be inferred. PTs with very low counts (e.g., n<5) should be interpreted cautiously due to statistical instability and wide uncertainty.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (4)

O

Onur Alkan

Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey

I

Ismail Nazlı

Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey

A

Ahmet Başgöze

Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof. Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey

M

Mahmut Gümüş

Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey