Phase 1 study of gotistobart (BNT316/ONC-392) in combination with lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (Lu 177) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

D David R. Wise (Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York, NY) T Tian Zhang (Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA) R Ronald Tutrone (United Urology Group, Towson, MD) B Biren Saraiya (Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ) A Andrew J. Armstrong A Alexandra Sokolova (Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR) S Shuchi Gulati (UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA) J Jose W. Avitia (New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM) M Manojkumar Bupathi (Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Littleton, CO) S Svetlana Shpyro (BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany) Q Qiong Wang Y Yang Liu P Pan Zheng (Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials & Surface Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Material Sciences and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, P. R. China) M Mark N. Stein (Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY)

Abstract

5067 Background: When used in combination with physician’s choice of care, Lu 177 showed significant PFS and OS improvements in mCRPC. Combinations with novel agents are being explored to extend the therapeutic benefit. Preclinical models have demonstrated that radiotherapy selectively expands and functionally activates regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME). Given the role of gotistobart (a unique pH-sensitive anti-CTLA-4 antibody that preserves CTLA-4 recycling and avoids lysosomal degradation) in selective depletion of Tregs in the TME, this study will initially test the safety and toxicity of gotistobart plus Lu 177 in mCRPC. Methods: PRESERVE-006 (NCT05682443) is an open-label, randomized, active control, multi-center, phase 1/2 study of gotistobart in combination with Lu 177 in patients with mCRPC who have progressed after androgen receptor pathway inhibition. Patients were randomized to receive gotistobart at 3 mg/kg, Q4W, 6 mg/kg Q6W, or 10 mg/kg Q6W for up to 13 doses plus Lu 177 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) Q6W for up to 6 doses, or to the control arm to receive Lu 177 7.4 GBq (200 mCi), Q6W for up to 6 doses. Here we report results from the dose escalation phase (Phase 1) that aims to assess safety and select two dose regimens for the Phase 2 dose optimization study. Results: As of December 20, 2024, 24 patients received at least 1 drug dose with a median 6.21 (range 1.2–11.3) months on study. Median age was 70.5 (range 52–86) years, and 62.5%, 25.0% and 4.2% were White, Black, and Asian, respectively. Median follow-up was 10.9, 2.6 and 5.4 months for the 3 mg/kg Q4W (N = 6), 6 mg/kg Q6W (N = 5) and 10 mg/kg Q6W (N = 6) combination regimens, respectively, and 6.5 months for Arm B Lu 177 (N = 7). No deaths, dose-limiting toxicity, or Gr 4–5 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were observed at any gotistobart dose. TRAEs related to gotistobart or Lu 177 were Gr 1–2 at 3 mg/kg Q4W and 6 mg/kg Q6W; one patient (16.7%) in the 3 mg/kg regimen had Gr 2 colitis leading to treatment discontinuation. At 10 mg/kg Q6W, two patients (33%) had Gr 3 colitis (both of whom discontinued treatment) and one patient (16.7%) had Gr 3 fatigue. Infusion-related reactions (Gr 1–2) were seen in 6 mg/kg (40.0%) and 10 mg/kg (66.7%) regimens. In the efficacy-evaluable population, confirmed PSA50 (a key secondary endpoint for Phase 2) was observed in 4 of 6 patients and 3 of 6 patients in 3 and 10 mg/kg regimens, respectively versus 1 of 6 patients in the Lu 177 control group. Conclusions: With known limitations in sample size during dose escalation,gotistobart in combination with Lu 177 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising preliminary PSA50 rates in patients with mCRPC during the dose escalation phase. Overall findings support combination regimens with gotistobart doses less than 10 mg/kg in the ongoing Phase 2 randomized dose optimization study. Clinical trial information: NCT05682443 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 5067-5067
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

D

David R. Wise

Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone, New York, NY

T

Tian Zhang

Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA

R

Ronald Tutrone

United Urology Group, Towson, MD

B

Biren Saraiya

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ

A

Andrew J. Armstrong

A

Alexandra Sokolova

Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

S

Shuchi Gulati

UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA

J

Jose W. Avitia

New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM

M

Manojkumar Bupathi

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Littleton, CO

S

Svetlana Shpyro

BioNTech SE, Mainz, Germany

Q

Qiong Wang

Y

Yang Liu

P

Pan Zheng

Key Laboratory of Superlight Materials & Surface Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Material Sciences and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, P. R. China

M

Mark N. Stein

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY