Phase 3 AMPLITUDE trial: Niraparib (NIRA) and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients (pts) with alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes.
Abstract
LBA5006 Background: NIRA is a highly selective and potent inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-1/2. In the MAGNITUDE trial, NIRA + AAP significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in HRR gene–altered metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled AMPLITUDE trial (NCT04497844) evaluated the efficacy and safety of NIRA + AAP in HRR gene–altered mCSPC. Methods: Pts with germline or somatic HRR gene alterations ( BRCA1 , BRCA2 , BRIP1 , CDK12 , CHEK2 , FANCA , PALB2 , RAD51B , RAD54L ) were randomized 1:1 to a dual-action tablet (NIRA 200 mg + abiraterone acetate 1000 mg) plus prednisone 5 mg, or PBO + AAP (hereafter AAP). Eligible pts had received ≤6 mo of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) ± ≤6 cycles of docetaxel (DOC) ± ≤45 d of AAP with metastatic disease extended beyond lymph nodes. The primary end point is investigator-assessed rPFS (time from randomization to radiographic progression or death). Secondary end points include time to symptomatic progression (TSP), overall survival (OS), and safety. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method and a stratified Cox model were used for time-to-event variables and the hazard ratio (HR) and stratified log-rank test for estimating treatment effect. This is the first and final analysis for rPFS and the first interim analysis (of 3) for OS (data cutoff, 7 Jan 2025). Approximately 261 rPFS events were required (2-sided α, 0.025; power, 91%) for an HR ≤0.64 to demonstrate efficacy. Results: 696 pts were randomized to NIRA + AAP (n=348) or AAP (n=348). Median age was 68 y (IQR, 61-74); 55.6% had BRCA1/2 alterations, 78% were high-volume metastatic (M1), 87% were de novo M1, and 16% had prior DOC. Median follow-up is 30.8 mo. The primary end point was met, with rPFS significantly longer with NIRA + AAP (median, not reached [NR]) vs AAP (29.5 mo [95% CI, 25.8-NR]; HR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.80], p=0.0001), including in the prespecified BRCA1/2 subgroup (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37-0.72], p<0.0001). TSP was significantly improved with NIRA + AAP vs AAP (HR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.69], p<0.0001; BRCA1/2 : HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.29-0.68], p=0.0001). A trend in OS was seen at this first interim analysis (193/389 events) favoring NIRA + AAP (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.59-1.04], p=0.10; BRCA1/2 : HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.51-1.11], p=0.15). Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 75.2% with NIRA + AAP and 58.9% with AAP, most commonly anemia (29.1% vs 4.6%) and hypertension (26.5% vs 18.4%). Treatment discontinuations due to AEs were low: NIRA + AAP: 11.0%; AAP: 6.9%. Conclusions: NIRA + AAP significantly improved rPFS and TSP vs AAP in pts receiving ADT +/- prior DOC and had a favorable effect on OS. There were no new safety signals. AMPLITUDE supports NIRA + AAP as a potential new standard of care for pts with HRR gene–altered mCSPC. Clinical trial information: NCT04497844 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Gerhardt Attard
Neeraj Agarwal
Division of Medical Oncology Department of Internal Medicine Huntsman Cancer Institute University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah USA
Julie N. Graff
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Shahneen Sandhu
From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...
Eleni Efstathiou
Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
Mustafa Özgüroğlu
Andrea J. Pereira de Santana Gomes
Liga Norte Riograndense Contra o Câncer, Natal, Brazil
Karina Costa Maia Vianna
Centro Integrado de Oncologia de Curitiba, Curitiba, Brazil
Hong Luo
Heather H. Cheng
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Won Kim
Carly Rachel Varela
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Daneen Schaeffer
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Shiva Dibaj
Johnson & Johnson, San Diego, CA
Susan Li
Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA
Fei Shen
Suneel Dinkar Mundle
Johnson & Johnson, Raritan, NJ
David Olmos
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Kim N. Chi
Dana Rathkopf
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY