Phase Engineering of Iridium Oxides Enables Direct Coupling of Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis With Intermittent Electrical Energy

Z Zhenglong Fan Q Qintao Sun (State Key Laboratory of Bioinspired Interfacial Materials Science Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM) Soochow University Suzhou Jiangsu P. R. China) F Fan Liao J Jiacheng Li (Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.) H Hao Yang H Hui Huang (Center of Basic Molecular Science (CBMS), Department of Chemistry) H Hao Zhang T Tao Cheng (Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Negative Carbon Technologies) Y Yang Liu M Minhua Shao (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology , , ,) Z Zhenhui Kang (School of Energy, School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Bioinspired Interfacial Materials Science, Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials Laboratory)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) coupled with intermittent renewables is a leading technology for green hydrogen production, but its large‐scale deployment is impeded by the sluggish kinetics and high iridium cost of the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Crystal phase regulation offers a rational approach to enhance catalyst intrinsic activity, yet a clear phase‐activity correlation for IrO 2 under realistic PEMWE conditions remains lacking. Here, we synthesize four crystalline phases of iridium oxide (metastable 1T‐, 3R‐, Tri‐, and conventional Rutile‐IrO 2 ) and demonstrate a strict phase‐dependent OER activity trend: 1T‐IrO 2 > 3R‐IrO 2 > Tri‐IrO 2 > Rutile‐IrO 2 . The 1T‐IrO 2 catalyst achieves a PEMWE performance of 3 A cm −2 at only 1.75 V with an Ir loading of 0.4 mg Ir cm −2 , exceeding the U.S. DOE 2026 target. It also shows stable operation for 2000 h at 2 A cm −2 and maintains durability during 1000 h of dynamic current cycling. In situ XANES/EXAFS analyses link the enhanced activity to a higher Ir oxidation state, while in situ Raman spectroscopy identifies the reaction pathway through characteristic Ir‐*OH, Ir‐*O, and Ir‐*OOH intermediates. This work establishes a direct phase‐activity relationship for IrO 2 catalysts and highlights the promise of phase engineering for efficient energy conversion.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 38, Issue 47
Published August 01, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (11)

Z

Zhenglong Fan

Q

Qintao Sun

State Key Laboratory of Bioinspired Interfacial Materials Science Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM) Soochow University Suzhou Jiangsu P. R. China

F

Fan Liao

J

Jiacheng Li

Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

H

Hao Yang

H

Hui Huang

Center of Basic Molecular Science (CBMS), Department of Chemistry

H

Hao Zhang

T

Tao Cheng

Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials and Devices, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Negative Carbon Technologies

Y

Yang Liu

M

Minhua Shao

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology , , ,

Z

Zhenhui Kang

School of Energy, School of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Bioinspired Interfacial Materials Science, Institute of Functional Nano and Soft Materials Laboratory