Phase I/Ib study of inavolisib (INAVO) + bevacizumab (BEV) or cetuximab (CETUX) for <i>PIK3CA</i> -mutated (mut) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

M Marwan Fakih (Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA) E Eric Xueyu Chen (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada) K Keun-Wook Lee (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea) T Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab S Sara Lonardi J Jun Gong E Elena Elez (Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona) J Janet Lau (Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA) V Vanessa Breton (Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, ON, Canada) O Omara Khan (Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden, United Kingdom) O Olga Chertkova (Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom) S Saket Jain S Sae-Won Han (Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

158 Background: PIK3CA mutations are common in CRC and may be a negative prognostic factor. INAVO is a potent and selective PI3Kα inhibitor that also promotes mut p110α degradation. BEV and CETUX are standard treatment (tx) components for RAS mut and RAS -wildtype (wt) mCRC, respectively. The Phase I/Ib INTRINSIC open-label umbrella study (NCT04929223) evaluates targeted therapies in biomarker-selected mCRC subpopulations. We report INAVO + BEV and INAVO + CETUX results. Methods: Patients (pts) with PIK3CA mut, RAS mut mCRC received INAVO (9 mg oral once daily) + BEV (intravenous [IV] 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks). Pts with PIK3CA mut, RAS wt mCRC received INAVO + CETUX (IV 400 mg/m 2 then 250 mg/m 2 weekly thereafter). Primary endpoint: confirmed objective response rate (cORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were exploratory. Results: At the clinical cut-off dates, 16 pts were enrolled in the BEV arm; 35, in the CETUX arm. Most had ≥2 metastatic sites at enrollment (n = 16 [100%] and 30 [85.8%], respectively) and ≥2 prior lines of metastatic therapy (16 [100%] and 28 [80.0%]). In the BEV arm, 3 pts (18.8%) had no prior BEV. In the CETUX arm, 25 pts (71.4%) had no prior CETUX; 17 (48.6%) had prior anti-EGFR therapy. All pts in the BEV arm and 34 in the CETUX arm were evaluated for efficacy and safety. Median follow-up was 9.4 months (mo; interquartile range: 5.5–14.4) and 12.6 mo (8.9–16.6), respectively. Efficacy is shown in the Table. All pts had adverse events (AEs); 15 (93.8%) and 34 (100%), respectively, had tx-related AEs (TRAEs); 5 (31.2%) and 12 (35.3%), grade 3–4 TRAEs; 2 (12.5%) and 11 (32.4%), serious AEs. One grade 5 AE (infusion-related reaction) occurred (CETUX arm). Dose reduction/interruption due to AEs occurred in 12 (75.0%) and 27 (79.4%) pts; tx withdrawal due to AEs, in 0 and 4 (11.8%) pts, respectively. Hyperglycemia was the most common AE, TRAE, and AE leading to dose reduction/interruption in both cohorts. Hypertension was observed more frequently with BEV; dermatitis acneiform and dry skin, with CETUX. Conclusions: INAVO + BEV and INAVO + CETUX showed encouraging efficacy in pts with PIK3CA mut mCRC, with no new or unexpected safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT04929223 . INAVO + BEV(n = 16) INAVO + CETUX(n = 34) cORR, all PR, n (%) 1 (6.3) 7 (20.6)* SD, n (%) 10 (62.5) 17 (50.0) Progressive disease, n (%) 3 (18.8) 9 (26.5) Missing/NE, n (%) 2 (12.5) 1 (2.9) mDoR, mo (90% CI) 7.7 (NE) 4.4 (4.2–5.3) DCR, n (%) 11 (68.8) 15 (44.1) mPFS, mo (90% CI) 4.2 (2.8–6.8) 3.5 (2.8–4.4) mOS, mo (90% CI) 11.0 (8.5–14.5) 12.8 (10.7–13.8) CI, confidence interval; m, median; NE, not evaluable; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. *3 pts with PRs received prior anti-EGFR therapy; 1 had a best prior response of SD (last dose 233 days before study tx) and 2 had best prior responses of PRs (last doses 134 and 171 days before study tx).

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 158-158
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

M

Marwan Fakih

Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA

E

Eric Xueyu Chen

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada

K

Keun-Wook Lee

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea

T

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

S

Sara Lonardi

J

Jun Gong

E

Elena Elez

Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona

J

Janet Lau

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA

V

Vanessa Breton

Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Mississauga, ON, Canada

O

Omara Khan

Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden, United Kingdom

O

Olga Chertkova

Roche Products Limited, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom

S

Saket Jain

S

Sae-Won Han

Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea