Population-based assessment of treatment patterns for high-risk localized prostate cancer.
Abstract
349 Background: Patients diagnosed with high- or very high risk (H/vHR) prostate cancer (PCa) are at substantial risk of disease recurrence, metastasis, and death after treatment. Historically, treatment paradigms for these patients have been similar to those with intermediate-risk (IR) disease [radiotherapy (RT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radical prostatectomy (RP)] though there is a growing body of evidence supporting intensified systemic therapy in this group. To contextualize this emerging trial data, we characterized real world treatment patterns for these patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using province-wide linked administrative data in Ontario, Canada. We descriptively characterized initial treatment patterns (within 1 year of diagnosis) for men with H/vHR PCa and compared them to a concurrent cohort of patients with IR disease to assess differences in management. Results: We identified 13,206 patients diagnosed with H/vHR PCa from 2010-2021 who were compared to 18,365 with IR disease. Most patients received active treatment, though rates were statistically significantly higher in the H/vHR (n=12,606, 95.5%) than IR cohort (n=14,995, 81.6%; p<0.001; standardized diff 0.44). 6207 (47%) of patients in the H/vHR cohort and 7286 (40%) of patients in the IR cohort underwent RP (p<0.001; standardized difference 0.148). Median time to RP was 98 days in the HR cohort and 105 days in the IR cohort (Median time (Q1-Q3); p<0.003; standardized difference 0.11). 6321 (47.9%) of those with H/vHR disease and 7427 (40.4%) of those with IR disease underwent radiotherapy (p<0.001; standardized difference 0.150). Very few patients received intensified systemic therapy: 77 patients (0.2%) received chemotherapy and 49 (0.2%) received androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. While treatment patterns were similar, patients with H/vHR disease were more likely to progress to metastasis (46% vs 30%, p<0.001) and more rapidly (2.6 vs 4.3 years, p<0.001), with similar patterns observed for CRPC, mCRPC treatment, prostate cancer events, and death. Conclusions: Despite higher rates of treatment, patients with H/vHR localized disease experience significantly worse clinical outcomes than those with IR. These data highlight the need for therapies which can improve clinical outcomes in this patient population, such as the potential use of intensified systemic therapies including Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPIs).
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Christopher J.D. Wallis
Division of Urology and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Shawn Malone
Ilias Cagiannos
The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Robert James Hamilton
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
Naveen S. Basappa
Cristiano Ferrario
Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Geoffrey Gotto
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Ricardo Fernandes
Tamim Niazi
Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Chris Morash
The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Ricardo A. Rendon
Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
Fred Saad
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal
Sebastien J Hotte
Juravinski Cancer Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Brendan J.W. Osborne
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
Anousheh Zardan
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Toronto, ON, Canada
Bobby Shayegan