Predictors of pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant TCHP in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Abstract
e12519 Background: In HER2+ breast cancer (BC), pathologic complete response (pCR) following HER2-directed neoadjuvant therapy is an established surrogate marker for long-term survival. In a HERMET trial, the addition of metformin to standard docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TCHP) did not result in a significant improvement in pCR rates. We performed a post hoc analysis of all participants enrolled in the HERMET trial to identify pathologic predictors of pCR. Methods: This single-center study enrolled 61 patients with operable HER2+ BC (tumor ≥2 cm and/or node-positive) who were randomized 1:1 to neoadjuvant TCHP for 6 cycles + placebo (n = 30) or metformin (n = 31). The primary endpoint was pCR, defined as the absence of residual invasive disease in the breast and axillary lymph nodes at the time of surgery. Logistic regression was performed using a prespecified multivariable model that included estrogen receptor (ER) status (0–9% vs ≥10%), HER2 category (IHC 3+ vs 2+), and Ki-67. Results: 61 patients were enrolled between August 17, 2017, and March 21, 2023; median age was 51 years. Overall, pCR was achieved in 30 of 61 (49.2%). HER2 IHC 3+ disease was present in 53 (86.9%), while 8 (13.1%) had HER2 IHC 2+ FISH positive disease. pCR occurred in 29 of 53 (54.7%) with HER2 IHC 3+ tumors compared with 1 of 8 (12.5%) with HER2 IHC 2+ tumors (Fisher’s exact p = 0.053). Ki-67 was available for 51 patients. Median Ki-67 was higher among patients who achieved pCR compared with those who did not (40% vs 32%). On univariate analysis, higher Ki-67 was associated with increased odds of pCR (odds ratio [OR] 1.03 per 1% increase; p = 0.028). In the prespecified multivariable model including ER status and HER2 category (N = 61), ER 0–9% was independently associated with higher odds of pCR compared with ER ≥10% (adjusted OR 2.7; 95% CI, 1.0–7.6; p = 0.049). HER2 IHC 3+ disease demonstrated a large but statistically borderline association with pCR compared with HER2 IHC 2+ disease (adjusted OR 7.8; 95% CI, 0.9–70; p = 0.061). Conclusions: Although patients with HER2+ BC defined as IHC 2+ with FISH amplification are treated similarly to those with IHC 3+ disease, their pCR rates were comparable to those observed in hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative BC. Clinical trial information: NCT03238495 . pCR by ER status and HER2 category. Variable Group N pCR N (%) ER 0-9% 23 15 (65.2) ≥10% 38 15 (39.5) HER2 2+ 8 1 (12.5) 3+ 53 29 (54.7)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Nirmala Ghimirey
KUMC, Kansas City, KS
Deepti Satelli
University of Kansas Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine, Kansas City, MO
Maire Okoniewski
1The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, United States
Cory R. Bivona
University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS
Lauren Elizabeth Nye
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Anne O'Dea
University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Kelsey Larson
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
Jamie L. Wagner
University of Kansas Center for Bioinformatics, Overland Park, KS
Christa Balanoff
KU Indian Creek Breast Surgery Center, Kansas City, KS
Stephanie LaFaver
Kumed, Westwood, KS
Priyanka Sharma
Qamar J. Khan