PROACTIF: Final results from the largest prospective real-world study of 1196 primary liver cancer patients (PLC) treated with yttrium-90 (Y90) glass transarterial radioembolization (TARE).

B Boris Guiu (Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France) G Ghoufrane Tlili (Hôpital du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France) C Clément Bailly (1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France) E Eric Vibert (Centre Hépato-Biliaire, AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France) J Julia Chalaye (CHU Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France) D Denis Mariano-Goulart (CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France) J Julien Edeline (Centre Eugène-Marquis, Rennes, France) J Jean Frederic Blanc (Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Service Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, Bordeaux, France) Y Yann Touchefeu (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France) G Gilles Grimon (Bicêtre Hôpital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France) H Hélène Regnault (CHU Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France) J Julie Roux (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France) A Antoine Bouvier (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Angers, Angers, France) I Isabelle Brenot-Rossi (Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France) G Geraldine Sergent (Hôpital Claude Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France) S Stephane Renaud (Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France) S Sylvain Manfredi (CHU Dijon Bourgogne – Hôpital François Mitterand, Dijon, France) A Arnaud Dieudonne (Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France) E Eric Vicaut (Unité de Recherche Clinique de l’Est Parisien (URCEST), Paris) E Etienne Garin (Eugène Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes, France)

Abstract

504 Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness, quality-of-life, safety, and dosimetry of Y90 glass microspheres for the treatment of primary and colorectal liver metastasis in a real-world clinical setting. Herein, we present the final data for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [iCCA]. Methods: All patients treated with Y90 glass microspheres (TheraSphere) between 2019 and 2024 who agreed to data collection were included from 34 French institutions. Duration of follow-up and overall survival (OS) were assessed by reverse Kaplan-Meier (KM) and KM analysis, respectively. Toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v5. Pre/post-treatment dosimetry was re-assessed by central read using activity determined by the site. Results: In total, 1196 patients with PLC (989 HCC; 207 iCCA) were included. Of the HCC patients, 35.3% had portal vein thrombosis; 13.3%, 18.9%, 57.9%, and 5.8% were BCLC A, B, C, D, respectively. Among iCCA patients, 56.5% were ECOG 0; 31.9% had associated liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. At least one prior treatment was reported in 39% of PLC patients (systemic, n=194; locoregional [LRT], n=289; surgery, n=72). Personalized multicompartment dosimetry was used for 73% of patients and selective treatment administration was used for 55%. By central assessment, pretreatment mean absorbed dose to total perfused tumor was 422.1 Gy in HCC and 357.2 Gy in iCCA. Median OS [95%CI] was 21.8 months (M) [20.1 – 23.3] for HCC and 21.9M [18.2 – 24.3] for iCCA. iCCA patients treated with TARE as a first-line treatment had longer OS (23.3M) compared to patients treated as a second-line treatment (11.4M). More than half of PLC patients had subsequent treatment (54%). PLC patients who had post-Y90 surgery (12%) had the greatest OS benefit. In HCC, median OS was 48.6M with subsequent surgery (n=112), 23.3M with subsequent LRT or systemic treatment (n=424), and 14.8M with no further treatment (n=396). In iCCA, median OS was not reached in patients with subsequent surgery (n=27), 21.3M for patients with subsequent LRT or systemic treatment (n=90), and 17.4M for patients without subsequent treatment (n=76). Among all patients, 93 experienced adverse events (AEs; n=134), 88 had serious AEs (n=114), and 45 patients had related/possibly related serious treatment-emergent AEs (3.8%). Conclusions: Results from this large prospective real-world study using contemporary TARE treatment highlight its critical role as an integral component in the continuum of care for patients with PLC. In most cases, patients received personalized treatment, resulting in meaningful survival, and an acceptable adverse event profile. Importantly, TARE followed by surgery resulted in survival outcomes rarely observed in this population of patients typically not eligible for surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT04069468 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 2_suppl
Published January 10, 2026
Pages 504-504
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

B

Boris Guiu

Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier, France

G

Ghoufrane Tlili

Hôpital du Haut-Lévêque, Bordeaux, France

C

Clément Bailly

1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France

E

Eric Vibert

Centre Hépato-Biliaire, AP-HP, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France

J

Julia Chalaye

CHU Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France

D

Denis Mariano-Goulart

CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France

J

Julien Edeline

Centre Eugène-Marquis, Rennes, France

J

Jean Frederic Blanc

Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Service Hépato-Gastroentérologie et Oncologie Digestive, Bordeaux, France

Y

Yann Touchefeu

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France

G

Gilles Grimon

Bicêtre Hôpital, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

H

Hélène Regnault

CHU Henri-Mondor, Créteil, France

J

Julie Roux

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France

A

Antoine Bouvier

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Angers, Angers, France

I

Isabelle Brenot-Rossi

Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France

G

Geraldine Sergent

Hôpital Claude Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France

S

Stephane Renaud

Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan, Perpignan, France

S

Sylvain Manfredi

CHU Dijon Bourgogne – Hôpital François Mitterand, Dijon, France

A

Arnaud Dieudonne

Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France

E

Eric Vicaut

Unité de Recherche Clinique de l’Est Parisien (URCEST), Paris

E

Etienne Garin

Eugène Marquis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rennes, France