Prognostic and predictive genomic biomarkers in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC): A large retrospective analysis of real-world data from a US-based clinico-genomic database (CGDB).
Abstract
473 Background: The absence of validated prognostic and predictive biomarkers constitutes a significant barrier to appropriate selection among immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations (ICI-C) for individual patients (pts) with mccRCC. Our study aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of single-gene alterations (GAs) and gene clusters in a large real-world case series of mccRCC. Methods: This study employed data from the US-based de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine Inc. (FH-FMI) CGDB, comprising 858 mccRCC pts diagnosed between 2011 and 2022 in 280 US cancer clinics. The presence of GAs was determined using Foundation Medicine tests on tumor tissue specimens. The co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity of the most common GAs were assessed utilizing Fisher's exact test. The Louvain algorithm was applied to identify three co-occurring gene clusters (C) on the gene network graph: C1: VHL , SETD2 , PBRM1 , KDM5C , NFE2L2; C2: TP53 , TSC1 , TERT , DNMT3A ; C3: CDKN2A , CDKN2B , BAP1 , NF2 , MTAP . Pts were labelled as C+ if they had one or more mutations within a specific cluster and none in the others. Cox proportional hazard model was used to discern the prognostic and predictive value of GAs. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The prognostic analysis encompassed 782 pts with mccRCC, while the predictive analysis involved 493 pts profiled with FMI genomic tests within 3 months of starting first-line systemic therapy (1L). GAs of seven genes ( CDKN2A , CDKN2B , TP53 , PTEN , NF2 , PIK3CA , MTAP ) correlated with a poorer prognosis, whereas PBRM1 mutants exhibited a favorable OS. C1+ pts had higher OS compared to C1- (mOS: 40 vs. 19 months; HR: 0.63, p <0.001), while C3+ was associated with worse OS (mOS: 18 vs. 27 months; HR: 1.36, p = 0.023). In 1L, 201 pts (40.8%) received antiangiogenic monotherapy (AAm) (mPFS: 7.0 months) and 172 pts (34.9%) received ICI-C (16.4% ICI+ICI, 18.5% ICI+AA) (mPFS: 6.8 months). 170 (34.5%), 43 (8.7%), and 71 (14.4%) pts were categorized as C1+, C2+, and C3+, respectively. TERT , TSC1 , and TET2 alterations were positive predictors of 1L-PFS for ICI-C vs. AAm (HR=0.44, 0.23, 0.20; p<0.05). C1+ favored AAm over ICI-C (HR=2.30, p=0.01) while C2+ favored ICI-C over AAm (HR=0.39, p=0.039). Among ICI-C, ICI+AA was more effective than ICI+ICI in pts with SETD2 alterations (HR=0.38, 0.020), and less effective in mutant TSC1 (HR=8.60, p=0.013). Conclusions: This study highlights the prognostic value of 8 GAs and 2 clusters of co-occurring GAs, and identifies 3 GAs and 1 cluster of co-occurring GAs to be positive predictors of 1L-PFS for ICI-C in a large mccRCC population. Prospective validation is required to confirm the prognostic and predictive role of these GAs and to tailor therapeutic strategies.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Mimma Rizzo
Gaetano Pezzicoli
Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari ‘Aldo Moro’, Bari, Italy
Camilla Porta
Massimiliano Povero
AdRes Health Economics and Outcome Research, Turin, Italy
Lorenzo Pradelli
Emilia Sicari
Valentina Sara Barbiero
Roche SpA, Monza, Italy
Camillo Porta
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy