Prognostic impact of cancer therapy–related cardiotoxicity on oncologic outcomes.
Abstract
e24023 Background: Cancer therapy-related cardiotoxicity is a common complication of modern anticancer treatments and may adversely affect oncologic outcomes by limiting treatment delivery. While cardiotoxicity is well studied as a cardiovascular safety endpoint, its prognostic impact on cancer outcomes remains incompletely defined and appears to vary across cancer types and treatment settings. Methods: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD420261294684) of observational studies evaluating the association between cardiotoxicity and oncologic outcomes. Eligible studies included adults (≥18 years) with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies receiving systemic anticancer therapy, including anthracyclines, HER2-targeted therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cellular therapies, or other agents. Studies were required to report oncologic outcomes stratified by cardiotoxicity status. Cardiotoxicity was defined using study-specific criteria and included left ventricular ejection fraction decline (typically ≥10% to < 50%), clinical heart failure, myocarditis, clinically significant arrhythmias, biomarker elevation, or cardiotoxicity leading to treatment interruption or discontinuation. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free or disease-free survival (PFS/DFS). Results were synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity. Results: Eight observational studies met inclusion criteria (3,620 patients). Study designs included retrospective cohorts and prospective registries, with sample sizes ranging from 60 to 1,399 patients and median follow-up of 6-72 months. Associations between cardiotoxicity and oncologic outcomes were heterogeneous. Cardiotoxicity was independently associated with worse OS in patients receiving CAR-T therapy (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.17-2.92; p = 0.009) and in the cohorts experiencing severe cardiotoxicity (HR 10.2, 95% CI 5.5-19.2; p < 0.001). In contrast, adjuvant trastuzumab-treated breast cancer cohorts showed no consistent association between cardiotoxicity and OS (HR 1.68, 95% CI 0.83–3.41; p = 0.148). For DFS or recurrence-free survival, cardiotoxicity leading to treatment interruption was associated with inferior outcomes (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), while other cohorts showed non-significant trends. Across studies, cardiotoxicity was consistently linked to treatment interruption, dose reduction, or early discontinuation. Conclusions: Cardiotoxicity is associated with adverse oncologic outcomes primarily in patients with severe or clinically overt cardiac events and in intensive treatment settings. Mild or asymptomatic cardiotoxicity, particularly in adjuvant HER2-positive breast cancer, was not consistently associated with worse survival but frequently resulted in treatment modification. Prospective studies using standardized cardiotoxicity definitions are needed to better define prognostic risk.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Aayushi Mehta
Government Medical College Surat, Surat, India
Nidhi Vadhavekar
Padmashree Dr. D Y Patil School of Medicine, Navi Mumbai, India
Hema Gedela
Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, NY
Sravani Bhavanam
2Brookdale University Hospital and Medical center, Brooklyn, United States
Tanisha Sanganeria
R.G. Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India
Aseef Rehman
University College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Madho Mal
4Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of medicine, Huntington, United States
Christian Cortes
Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Hospital Universitario, Monterrey, Mexico
Narmada Pinnamraju
Independent Researcher, Columbus, OH
Muhammad Shamoon Umerani
Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Mahnoor Nadeem
Liaquat University of Medical and Health Science, Karachi, Pakistan