Prospective Validation of Circulating Tumor DNA Measurable Residual Disease After First-Line Therapy in Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Abstract
PURPOSE End-of-treatment (EOT) response evaluation by positron emission tomography (PET) remains suboptimal in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), because of its limited positive predictive value (PPV). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)—based measurable residual disease (MRD) detection offers a minimally invasive approach and may improve prognostication. We prospectively evaluated EOT MRD using phased variant enrichment and detection sequencing (PhasED-Seq) in patients with first-line LBCL. METHODS Patients were enrolled in the HOVON-902 prospective cohort and received curative-intent first-line treatment. Phased variants (PVs) were identified and tracked using tumor biopsies or pretreatment plasma. The prognostic significance of EOT ctDNA-MRD status in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was compared with that of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and EOT PET-computed tomography (CT). RESULTS PV identification was successful in 134 of 136 (99%) using either tissue or plasma. At EOT, 83% of patients were MRD-negative and 17% of patients were MRD-positive. MRD positivity was strongly associated with inferior outcomes: the 3-year PFS was 17% in MRD-positive versus 85% in MRD-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR], 9.8 [95% CI, 5.1 to 19]; P = 9.63 × 10 −12 ), and the OS was 43% versus 92%, respectively (HR, 7.7 [95% CI, 3.4 to 17.4]; P = 1.27 × 10 −6 ). In multivariate analysis, MRD was an independent prognostic factor when controlling for IPI and EOT PET-CT. MRD positivity had a higher PPV for 2-year PFS than positive PET (68% v 56%, P ≤ .001), whereas negative predictive value was similar between negative MRD and PET (89% v 88%, P = .71). MRD positivity was associated with a significantly higher relapse risk within both complete metabolic response (CMR) and non-CMR subgroups. CONCLUSION This study validates ultrasensitive ctDNA-MRD detection using PhasED-Seq in a uniformly treated, prospective real-world LBCL cohort. These findings support further evaluation of MRD integration into clinical response assessment.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (21)
Steven Wang
Department of Mechanical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong
Marcel Nijland
Leonie Strobbe
Gelre Hospital, Zutphen, The Netherlands
Margriet Oosterveld
Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Rinske Boersma
Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
Harry Koene
6Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Clara Klerk
Dijklander Hospital, Hoorn, The Netherlands
Eva de Jongh
14Albert Schweitzer ziekenhuis, Doredrecht, Netherlands
Ad Koster
13VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, Netherlands
Hans Pruijt
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, ’s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
Marjolein Van Der Poel
4Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
Erik van Werkhoven
15The Hemato-Oncology Foundation for Adults in the Netherlands (HOVON), Rotterdam, Netherlands
Helma Zanders
Hemato-Oncology Foundation for Adults in The Netherlands (HOVON), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Avinash Dinmohamed
16Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands
Michiel Pegtel
Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Stephanie Meek
8Foresight Diagnostics, Inc., Boulder, United States
Sierra Love Stowell
Natera, Inc, Austin, TX
Hayley Warinske
Foresight Diagnostics, Inc, Boulder, CO
Ash A. Alizadeh
David M. Kurtz
Martine E.D. Chamuleau
Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC—Location Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands