Racial differences in the association between agent orange exposure and the progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma in US Veterans.

L Lawrence W. Liu (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) B Byron Sigel (3Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, St Louis, United States) M Mei Wang (School of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute for New Energy Materials & Low Carbon Technologies) M Martin W. Schoen (Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) M Murali Janakiram (10City of Hope, Duarte, United States) T Theodore Seth Thomas (Saint Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO) M Mark A. Schroeder (5Bone Marrow Transplantation and Leukemia Section, Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO) K Kristen Marie Sanfilippo (Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) S Su-Hsin Chang

Abstract

10555 Background: Agent Orange (AO), an herbicide used during the Vietnam War Era (1/9/1962-5/7/1975), is implicated in myelomagenesis due to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). TCDD has a long half-life (3.2 years) and many occupations (e.g. pest control, agricultural, etc) are exposed. Work from our group (Liu L, et al., JHO 2024) demonstrated that AO exposure during the high TCDD period of 1/9/1962-11/30/1965 was associated with increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) to myeloma (MM) progression. Given the higher incidence of MM in Black patients, we assessed whether there are racial differences in this association. Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with MGUS from 10/1/1999-12/31/2021 in the Veterans Health Administration. a published natural language processing-based algorithm was used to confirm diagnoses of MGUS and MM. We excluded: progression<1y, non-IgG/IgA subtype, race other than Black or White due to low numbers, no service during 1/9/1962-5/7/1975, and birth years outside of 1924-1953 so that the groups with and without exposures both have the same birth year range. Patients were stratified by race (Black or White). AO exposure was stratified by three TCDD levels: high (1/9/1962–11/30/1965), medium (12/1/1965–12/31/1970), or low (1/1/1971–5/7/1975). The association between AO exposure levels and progression were estimated using multivariable Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model with death as a competing event and presented by multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). The covariates included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), monoclonal protein (M-protein) level, MGUS subtype, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Results: We identified 3,960 Black patients (AO exposed: n=865 [21.8%]) and 6,887 White patients (AO exposed: n=1,986 [28.8%]) with MGUS. Compared to no exposure: Black patients had aHR 1.03 (95% CI 0.51-2.06) for high, aHR 0.88 (95% CI 0.65-1.17) for medium, and aHR 0.3 (0.08-1.18) for low exposure, and White patients had aHR 1.80 (95% CI 1.14-2.83) for high, aHR 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.46) for medium, and aHR 1.17 (95% CI 0.66-2.05) for low exposure. Conclusions: White patients had an 80% increased risk of progression with AO exposure during the high TCDD period. No association was observed in Black patients. Multivariable analysis of the association between AO exposure and risk of progression to MM by race. Black (N=3,960) White (N=6,887) Variable aHR (95% CI) P-value aHR (95% CI) P-value AO Exposure No exposure ref. ref. Low TCDD Level 0.30 (0.08-1.18) 0.08 1.17 (0.66-2.05) 0.59 Medium TCDD Level 0.88 (0.65-1.17) 0.37 1.18 (0.95-1.46) 0.14 High TCDD Level 1.03 (0.51-2.06) 0.94 1.80 (1.14-2.83) 0.01 The covariates included age, sex, MGUS subtype, BMI, m-protein, and CCI at MGUS diagnosis.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 10555-10555
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

L

Lawrence W. Liu

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

B

Byron Sigel

3Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, St Louis, United States

M

Mei Wang

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute for New Energy Materials & Low Carbon Technologies

M

Martin W. Schoen

Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

M

Murali Janakiram

10City of Hope, Duarte, United States

T

Theodore Seth Thomas

Saint Louis VA Medical Center John Cochran Division, St. Louis, MO

M

Mark A. Schroeder

5Bone Marrow Transplantation and Leukemia Section, Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO

K

Kristen Marie Sanfilippo

Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

S

Su-Hsin Chang