Randomized Phase II Study of Concurrent Versus Sequential Pembrolizumab in Combination With Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

D Dan P. Zandberg (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA) L Lazar Vujanovic (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA) D David A. Clump (Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV) B Brian P. Isett (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA) H Hong Wang G Gabriel Sica R Riyue Bao (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh) H Housayin Li (Molecular Genetics and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) J James Ohr (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA) H Heath D. Skinner R Raja R. Seethala (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) S Simion I. Chiosea (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) R Robert L. Ferris (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) J Julie E. Bauman

Abstract

PURPOSE The optimal timing of pembrolizumab with chemoradiation (CRT) in locally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unknown. Patients and Methods Our phase II trial randomly assigned patients 1:1 to concurrent pembrolizumab (200 mg once every 3 weeks × 8) starting 1 week before CRT (cisplatin 40 mg/m 2 once weekly + radiation 70 Gy) versus sequential pembrolizumab starting 2 weeks after CRT. Human papillomavirus (HPV)+ (>10 pack-years or T4 or N3) and HPV(–) LA HNSCC were included, stratified by HPV and N stage. In our pick-the-winner design, if both arms met the trivariate primary end point (1-year locoregional failure <60%, progression-free survival [PFS] ≥60%, and dose limiting toxicity rate ≤20%), the arm with numerically superior 1-year PFS would be selected. Survival end points were compared by a univariate Cox model. Pretreatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies (week 2 of CRT) were evaluated by multispectral imaging and compared using two-sided paired t -tests. RESULTS Treated patients (41 concurrent and 39 sequential) were 71% oropharynx (53% HPV+), 92.5% stage IV (46% T4, 76% N2), similar by arm. Both arms met the trivariate primary end point, with superior 1-year PFS in the sequential arm (84% v 71%) and favorable 4-year outcomes: locoregional control (96% v 64%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.11 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.89]; P = .012), PFS (69% v 49%; HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.25 to 1.22]; P = .132), and overall survival (83% v 71%; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.19 to 1.37]; P = .17). There was a significant increase in macrophages, PD-L1+ macrophages, and PD-L1+ tumor cells with treatment in the concurrent but not the sequential arm. CONCLUSION CRT with sequential pembrolizumab met criteria for further study. Immunosuppressive changes in the TME differed between arms, reflecting the impact of one dose of pembrolizumab in the concurrent arm.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 23
Published August 10, 2025
Pages 2572-2582
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

D

Dan P. Zandberg

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

L

Lazar Vujanovic

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

D

David A. Clump

Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV

B

Brian P. Isett

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

H

Hong Wang

G

Gabriel Sica

R

Riyue Bao

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh

H

Housayin Li

Molecular Genetics and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

J

James Ohr

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

H

Heath D. Skinner

R

Raja R. Seethala

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

S

Simion I. Chiosea

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

R

Robert L. Ferris

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

J

Julie E. Bauman